hmmz ...
isnt NKF limited to the charity rule that states no more than $1 out of every $5 donation can be used for administration funds? meaning staff salaries ,administration costs etc
a more cynical take on the NKF scandal here.
we have the patron of the NKF , mrs goh chok tong still standing by the NKF. the NKF is apparently in a state of semi quasi national run and semi quasi private charity organisation and semi-quasi business operations.
mr.TT durai pays taxes to the IRS. the IRS would have known the details of his paycheck long before the recent media expose on his accounts. the board of directors on any organisation serves as an counterbalance to prevent the CEO from exploiting any inherent excessive benefits or ethical misjudgement in the line of duty . the NKF board did nothing to stop it and further approved additional benefits.
3 additional years of reserves versus 260 million in the kitty and over 26 years of reserves assuming a consistent rate of NKF spending. no way such a simple fact can go unnoticed by the various government bodies that cooperate with the NKF.
about turns and changes in public policy. the blatant lying and denial of first class tickets , gold taps , insufficent reserves. the act of covering up. the betrayal of public trust by a public organisation.
recent years the media has featured articles about growing viewer and donor fatigue over the increasing amount of charity shows and the number of programmes that feature the poor , the needy and the ill all desperatly pleading for money.
TT durai is a trained lawyer , with experience of being called to the bar and specialising in defamation cases , according to the ST report on his background. he practiced in england and later in singapore.
the timing , the circumstances , the occurences , appear deeper than they seem.
how is it possible that TT durai ? a trained lawyer , go to court with such explicit details concerning his pay , perks and other normally confidential facts potentially being exposed and potentially damaging ? how could one so bright and brilliant, growing and managing such a complex body that covers national healthcare policies in terms of dialysis , cancer and children's dialysis overlook such critical flaw in judgement ?
i dont know, it may seem baseless , but i feel the NKF incident is a much deeper incident involving realpolitik. if NKF were a full corporate business , like CAAO, the CPIB would have been called in. Deception of shareholder's interest in the company is fraud after all . why hasnt the CPIB been called in on the NKF ? given that it is publicly accountable to its donors ?
isnt NKF limited to the charity rule that states no more than $1 out of every $5 donation can be used for administration funds? meaning staff salaries ,administration costs etc
a more cynical take on the NKF scandal here.
we have the patron of the NKF , mrs goh chok tong still standing by the NKF. the NKF is apparently in a state of semi quasi national run and semi quasi private charity organisation and semi-quasi business operations.
mr.TT durai pays taxes to the IRS. the IRS would have known the details of his paycheck long before the recent media expose on his accounts. the board of directors on any organisation serves as an counterbalance to prevent the CEO from exploiting any inherent excessive benefits or ethical misjudgement in the line of duty . the NKF board did nothing to stop it and further approved additional benefits.
3 additional years of reserves versus 260 million in the kitty and over 26 years of reserves assuming a consistent rate of NKF spending. no way such a simple fact can go unnoticed by the various government bodies that cooperate with the NKF.
about turns and changes in public policy. the blatant lying and denial of first class tickets , gold taps , insufficent reserves. the act of covering up. the betrayal of public trust by a public organisation.
recent years the media has featured articles about growing viewer and donor fatigue over the increasing amount of charity shows and the number of programmes that feature the poor , the needy and the ill all desperatly pleading for money.
TT durai is a trained lawyer , with experience of being called to the bar and specialising in defamation cases , according to the ST report on his background. he practiced in england and later in singapore.
the timing , the circumstances , the occurences , appear deeper than they seem.
how is it possible that TT durai ? a trained lawyer , go to court with such explicit details concerning his pay , perks and other normally confidential facts potentially being exposed and potentially damaging ? how could one so bright and brilliant, growing and managing such a complex body that covers national healthcare policies in terms of dialysis , cancer and children's dialysis overlook such critical flaw in judgement ?
i dont know, it may seem baseless , but i feel the NKF incident is a much deeper incident involving realpolitik. if NKF were a full corporate business , like CAAO, the CPIB would have been called in. Deception of shareholder's interest in the company is fraud after all . why hasnt the CPIB been called in on the NKF ? given that it is publicly accountable to its donors ?
