back to the main subject...
now I am very clear:
two sides:
-1- hardware
-2- software
with different solutions:
-1.1- sound modules
-1.2- samplers
-1.3- keyboards used as sound module
and
-2.1- soundfont
-2.2- soft synth
-2.3- soft sampler
I am sure there must be a lot of good and bad points depending of what you use them for... but surely something must be a kind of overall best solution or just overall less bad solution...?
Lets consider two aspects: recording and performing...
recording, time is not an issue, if a track is not ok, you can do it again, change the setting, even the software instrument... seems like software solutions give more flexibility... of course it will cost you more time than arriving with the proper instruments and recording in one go...
performing, more tricky to use soft synth, becaquse of computer need and because of lack of reliability... hardware is better, and keyboard with sequencer and sounds is more compact...
Is this correct? is there any stable solid solution of soft synth (not fancy, just covering sound module capabilities) that works really fine and can support a variety of good quality sounds (might not require 24/192...)?
In term of hardware, are the companies really changing a lot from a module to another one? It looks to me like Roland sounds remain more or less the same as do Korg and Yamaha sounds... what are the real efforts these companies are putting in providing better quality and more sounds in sound modules and keyboards?
Hope you can help me to understand this, since surely I need input to continue to expand my environment...
Thanks in advance for your input.
now I am very clear:
two sides:
-1- hardware
-2- software
with different solutions:
-1.1- sound modules
-1.2- samplers
-1.3- keyboards used as sound module
and
-2.1- soundfont
-2.2- soft synth
-2.3- soft sampler
I am sure there must be a lot of good and bad points depending of what you use them for... but surely something must be a kind of overall best solution or just overall less bad solution...?
Lets consider two aspects: recording and performing...
recording, time is not an issue, if a track is not ok, you can do it again, change the setting, even the software instrument... seems like software solutions give more flexibility... of course it will cost you more time than arriving with the proper instruments and recording in one go...
performing, more tricky to use soft synth, becaquse of computer need and because of lack of reliability... hardware is better, and keyboard with sequencer and sounds is more compact...
Is this correct? is there any stable solid solution of soft synth (not fancy, just covering sound module capabilities) that works really fine and can support a variety of good quality sounds (might not require 24/192...)?
In term of hardware, are the companies really changing a lot from a module to another one? It looks to me like Roland sounds remain more or less the same as do Korg and Yamaha sounds... what are the real efforts these companies are putting in providing better quality and more sounds in sound modules and keyboards?
Hope you can help me to understand this, since surely I need input to continue to expand my environment...
Thanks in advance for your input.