Cheez
Moderator
Yes, if you don't have Kontakt and you want to save money, EWQLSO Silver is a good way to go with their built-in PLAY engine. Also, GPO4 is very good and cost effective - with their own proprietary ARIA engine. GPO4 has probably more articulations than EWQLSO Silver. I would suggest GPO4; if you want EWQLSO, then at least get Gold.
Actually, most scoring sampling do not need a Xeon. It's only this year when string libraries come up with the new divisi programming that we are seeing this kind of thing. Most developers are trying to keep the CPU/RAM load as low as possible so live performers can use them on their mobile setups/notebooks. That's actually quite bad. It means that once you loaded the strings into the Xeon, you can't load anything else. So to load a full orchestra, you'll need multiple machines. We are previously hindered only by RAM. Now we are hindered by CPU as well. Sad...
Actually, Kontakt is a good investment (better investment in getting Komplete rather than just Kontakt). Many 3rd party libraries are in Kontakt (this goes for non-orchestral samples as well). If I load multiple sampling engines at once (e.g. PLAY, Kontakt and other 3rd party VSTis), the CPU will have a heavier load. I prefer to load multiple sample libraries within one engine which will let me do more. However, if you intend to get EWQLSO, then you'll probably want to focus only on PLAY libraries from East West in the future so everything loads within PLAY. EXS24 is not as effective as the other samplers in terms of memory addressing and scripting.
By the way, Kontakt is highly efficient in Mac. And also, almost all of the libraries mentioned in this thread are native Kontakt libraries.
Actually, most scoring sampling do not need a Xeon. It's only this year when string libraries come up with the new divisi programming that we are seeing this kind of thing. Most developers are trying to keep the CPU/RAM load as low as possible so live performers can use them on their mobile setups/notebooks. That's actually quite bad. It means that once you loaded the strings into the Xeon, you can't load anything else. So to load a full orchestra, you'll need multiple machines. We are previously hindered only by RAM. Now we are hindered by CPU as well. Sad...
Actually, Kontakt is a good investment (better investment in getting Komplete rather than just Kontakt). Many 3rd party libraries are in Kontakt (this goes for non-orchestral samples as well). If I load multiple sampling engines at once (e.g. PLAY, Kontakt and other 3rd party VSTis), the CPU will have a heavier load. I prefer to load multiple sample libraries within one engine which will let me do more. However, if you intend to get EWQLSO, then you'll probably want to focus only on PLAY libraries from East West in the future so everything loads within PLAY. EXS24 is not as effective as the other samplers in terms of memory addressing and scripting.
By the way, Kontakt is highly efficient in Mac. And also, almost all of the libraries mentioned in this thread are native Kontakt libraries.
Last edited: