Singapore PM To Earn Almost 2 Million Dollars - After Pay Cut

Tribalcast

New member
Source:
http://news.sg.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=1801164

Singapore's prime minister is to lose 19 percent of his salary because of the global economic turmoil but will still earn almost two million US dollars a year, a report said Monday.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, his cabinet, and other senior administrators will see their pay cut by up to 19 percent next year because of salary components linked to the city-state's economic growth, The Straits Times website reported.

Singapore is in recession and the government said the economy could contract next year.

"In view of the clouded economic outlook and the likelihood that salaries will be lower next year, the government has decided to defer the January 2009 salary adjustment," the report quoted the Public Service Division as saying.

The Division could not be immediately reached for comment.

With the pay cut, Lee will earn 3.04 million dollars (1.99 million US) a year, while ministers will see an 18 percent drop to 1.57 million dollars, The Straits Times said.

Rare public fury erupted in April 2007 when the government announced salary hikes for politicians and senior officials. In response, Lee said the government would pay him the higher salary but he would "donate" the increase "to suitable good causes" for five years.

The White House said at the time that US President George W. Bush got paid 400,000 dollars per year for doing his job.

Singapore officials have said high salaries are necessary to recruit and retain talented individuals, and to prevent corruption.

Teo Chee Hean, the minister in charge of the civil service, said the government last year introduced the mechanism linking a significant proportion of senior civil servants' salaries to economic performance, a system which is working as planned.

"Public sector salaries follow the market up and down," The Straits Times quoted him as saying. "This mechanism allows salaries to respond more rapidly to market conditions."
 
^^ Lol...thts the kind of logic tht has gotten us this far.

A wise man once said, pay peanuts and you'll get monkeys.

Reality is we are paying more than peanuts, we still get those same monkeys.
 
400, 000 for a country that runs by itself. The people live for their dreams, work hard for what they want, be independent with who they are. In short, the people have an ability to sustain themselves, at least psychologically.

We pay a lot more than peanuts cos, despite us complaining our arse off, we are still VERY much dependent on the government for most of the things in our lives.

2 cents.
 
i still feel that if those ministers have a heart, they would donate their money to people who need it more.

i do understand the reasons behind tagging salaries in the public sector to the private sector, but this pay increase is actually a form of legal 'corruption', if you get what i mean. the money could be put to better use, especially in times like these.

it's not even funny, especially in the case of wong kan seng.
 
they deserve the pay. Honestly, I think the leaders of other countries are underpaid, and because Singaporeans are mostly bootlickers and authority suckups, they obviously need this government and hence the dependence justifies the pay.
 
i would say the dependence of the people on the government is a mindset that was cultivated instead of something that was present all along, though
 
Hmmm.......our PM is earning 5-6 times more than the most powerful man in the world - El Presidente of the USA. Maybe only less than a monach or dictator.

I wonder much of our income tax, GST, ERP, etc... monies go into these ministers' pay cheque?

That's the beauty of our one party government. Do whatever you like and keep those pesky "check and balances" out!

;)
 
^ Well, that's a different story altogether. We're talking personal pay cheque here, granted and approved by himself and his own party.

What you mentioned above is the cost to keep El Presidente alive! :D
 
We pay a lot more than peanuts cos, despite us complaining our arse off, we are still VERY much dependent on the government for most of the things in our lives.

So ya, ummm can u answer again how does it justify that kind of pay?

We are dependent on the government...ummm, so we owe them a living yea?
 
RR.. you have not counted the expense of those emergency SIA flights for spouses( not even the leaders!) of some pretty senior mentor A Gong when they fell sick.... we not even talking about the man supposed to be running the country.

At least we know about this one, i wonder what we don;t know.
 
I don't mind them getting high pay, but there should be a performance-based KPI for each of those ministers to justify it. A set of personal goals and targets for them to meet every year, and not just based on the state of the economy as a whole.

I don't think they have one, or if they do then it's not transparent. If they have then maybe they should make it available , i think ministers should be prepared to face the public eye if they don't perform up to expectations. How does one judge if a minister has overperform or underperform every year? By the fact that he doesn't fall asleep during parliament? If that is the case, quite a few would fail the standard too.
 
Whatever it is, whether it's fair or not. It doesn't matter as long as we're living harmoniously. If things are falling apart here and there, then things like this should be raise up.
 
Income tax in Singapore is not even that high. You guys shouldn't be complaining! Over here in North America/UK ppl pay like 40% tax. Imagine half your salary goes poof every month, gotta suck isnt it?

But i still feel it doenst justify the ministers getting so much while there are still so many financially unhealthy families in Sg.
 
With regards to corruption.... Finland has a better rating (12 points) compared to Singapore (21 points)...yet Finland's prime minister earns 253,000 SGD. This suggests that a high salary is in fact not a contributing factor to minimizing corruption.

Interestingly this same argument was used by Russian president Putin to justify doubling his own salary. Russia is ranked very poorly with (94 points). Georgi Satarov, president of the INDEM Foundation, told the radio station Ekho Moskvy: " Analysis of other countries shows there is no correlation between official corruption and the level of wages."

Further, linking a lack of corruption to economic growth is not necessarily correct. Anti-corruption campaigns are not exactly China's strongest suit, but for almost two decades it has remained the world's fastest- growing economy.
 
+1 indianstallion. which is why i feel its wrong to paying wks so much, but he didn't offer to resign when a suspected terrorist escaped under his watch. will his allw drop since he lost a major kpi?

bro ken: nah, old man paid for it in full.
 
Back
Top