i've read up to page two, and many points have been repeated. so here's what i have to say.
bands should get paid, it keeps things healthy. many bands have played for free in the past, and more often than not, if we as bands don't make a stand, we'll keep playing for free.
why do we need to be paid? we've forked out our own money, for our own equipment, rehearsal space, CDs, merchandise, exposure. all these things use talent and buy one isit? rubbish, money money money.
therefore, there should be a monetary respite. like i said, it keeps things healthy. organisers respect bands for the "talent, entertainment" they put out.
how much?
these are things that are settled between bands and organisers. if we don't START a culture where bands take a certain cut from the venue or organisers, it may NEVER take off. if you're playing for non-profit gigs and all, like musicforgood, its understandable. but if an independant organiser with no dosh asks bands that have made it clear where they stand on monetary renumeration, then like some of you said, politely decline, no love lost. we all do things for different reasons. sometimes a cause is enough renumeration for some bands, sometimes we're a bit more mercenary.
too idealistic for one's own good?
i might play for free at Stasis, we've played for beer at the POW, some events organisers give us 70bucks, the Esplanade is known to give out a few hundred. its a give and take scene, i help you, you help me.. we all hopefully happy. i've heard of a band who played for 50 BUCKS at the hard rock cafe! do you know how spoil market that is? now the Hard Rock thinks that all bands wanna play for 50 bucks shared among 5 people. if you don't protect your own scene, who's going to protect it for you? Electrico has perhaps set a benchmark for the asking price, but if you wanna see something take off professionally, its time to think bigger.