neuro182 said:
I find stars analogy abit out of point..
hmm ? why the bold tags >?
same thing here . my point benig even if u give michael schumacher a lousy beat up half assed racing car , he probably can still race it well. but how well can he do it ?
hmmz to be more precise. music consists of many many many details e.g sound /tone , technical playing , cohesion/ability to listen out /tightness , sense of rythmn , fingerstyle / picking/ p;ucking / strumming techniques.
to lump it down to
good guitar + good guitarist = great sound
bad guitar + good guitarist = ? sound
or what ever possible premutations we can list down here simply dosent make sense.
even technical skills such as picking / strumming / fingerstyle arent worth a damn if u have no sense or rythmn or simply dont bother to accomodate other parts in a band.
my point being is this. if ya are fairly competent, given the right tools , yould sound good. but if ya are good , given any equipment u can sound good . but how good ? that is the question. dun get me wrong on that bro.
as in ur analogy , give jimi hendrix any guitar and i equally agree with ya that he can probably rock the house down with his riffs ( hes lefty so that has to be a lefty guitar). but give him a TGM and a miniscule 15w amp with scooped tone and overly too much bass. his sound will also end up skewed.
skills is not equated to sound greatness. skills can help you get great sound but that depends alot on your equipment. seriouslly.
someone pro once told me this , "your rig is only as good as the weakest link in your signal chain(meaning the entire setup from amps to cables to guitars and whatever in between) "
but i agree entirely with what you said. nothing absolutely wrong with that. thats the pointlessness of this thread. there is no real right or wrong when it comes to the exact "G spot sound" from your guitar (as i put it).