sandywinds said:yes, thanks Crawldaddy for pointing out how i actually replied in relevence to the thread as he's one of those blasting his mouth or rather shooting others without reading.
i guess he's probable one of those who post stupid threads on soft.
so, i suggest you think twice before you post or really, nothing will change.
I suppose I came across sounding overly harsh ya?
Well, everything taken in context, allow me to explain to both Crawldaddy and you.
I did quote you.
ShredCow said:sandywinds said:.... but just take a loook at this webbie, look at the threads, i've spoken to some of the older softies and they agree that this webbie's purpose is going way off. Sorry, but i just wanted to voice out my views.
So, in context with what I quoted:
ShredCow said:While I find it somewhat good you feel this way...
Correct?
Now, I understand its my fault to have said:
ShredCow said:...I don't think your post helps in any way at all,
When I was only referring to the quoted text, NOT your WHOLE post. It should have been:
ShredCow said:...I don't think your comments (that I've quoted) helps in any way at all,
Right?
So from then on, I said:
ShredCow said:......and you just shot yourself in the foot, so to speak.
Because you said, "people tend to talk so much but what they(not everyone) say doesn't hold much substance."
And your comment, which I quoted, while noteworthy, will not help change SOFT in any way. Its just another comment.
So I hope I have "cleared up" whatever misunderstanding there is.
Oh, and do note, I never approached you in a way that was condescending? I never went, "Oh you are 'one of those blasting his mouth or rather shooting others without reading'". Neither did I assume you were 'probable one of those who post stupid threads on soft'.