Its not really an airshow, just open house. If they wanted to bring black knights and all, they would have blown their budget.
yeh but i really wish the planes would have done some stunts at least. its abit boring to just watch them fly past turn around then fly past again and then turn around and land.
i think itll be fricking cool if a plane would fly past a carpark in between 2 HDB flats at a VERY low altitude (50 ft or so off the ground), then take a sharp turn up after that, the residents would be very amazed, and very deaf.
I don't think it's about budget. There's not much of a difference economically anyways; the difference in fuel/money used in an aerobatics display and the aerial display would have been negligible, considering the amount of money already pumped into the open house.
itll be fricking cool if a plane would fly past a carpark in between 2 HDB flats at a VERY low altitude (50 ft or so off the ground), then take a sharp turn up after that, the residents would be very amazed, and very deaf.
FYI, aviation fuel is cheaper than petrol. lawl
yeah i know that dood, i didnt say its cheaper to fly a sortie than to take a drive...i was just mentioning that aviation fuel is cheaper when compared on a per litre basis. Then again, military fixed wing jets drink a loooot moreAnd FYI, it takes alot of fuel to even do a sortie. Just performing EOR (in case you dunno, it means end of runway checks), NOT EVEN TAKING OFF, takes up 800lbs. A car dussen even use that much fuel in a journey from Singapore to Malaysia. Its not a matter of price per litre. Its a matter of litres used in one friggin flight.
That is why it costs so much to do a sortie, to do our peacetime training.
i was just mentioning that aviation fuel is cheaper when compared on a per litre basis. Then again, military fixed wing jets drink a loooot more