Harsh criticism is usually hard to take. Do band musicians in Singapore want to be artists or do they just want to be in a band? If they consider themselves artists, well, there are good and bad artists.
It is not possible to be fully objective and hence everyone's views are, in all nakedness, subjective.
At the heart of it, Blank is well-meaning. His harshness, I believe, stems from frustration at the standard of the scene. He is straightforward, and I agree with many of his points, even his specific opinions about some local bands. If these bands can take such criticisms honestly, they stand to become good artists. If they do not see the need to, they remain as mere bands.
The local scene needs stimulation and independent thought, instead of regurgitation from aplenty clone bands (to borrow the term ’clone bands’ from a musician from a well-known local band who is releasing a solo album soon). It is truly not necessary for anyone to be successful to criticise, as a few others have already mentioned in this thread. Blank’s thoughts are commendable because, if he were to compose music, one can fairly expect that he will not settle for anything less than fresh, original, provocative, or inspiring, as opposed to imitative, regurgitating, wannabe, or simply subpar.
The probable problem with the local scene is that there is a lack of people like him with independent thought who can also compose music. Instead, there are plenty of people who learn the instruments, can produce flashy guitar solos based on standard famous solos they learnt, and focus on wanting to be in a band instead of artistry and originality in music. This refers to bands all around Singapore – in various band competitions – not just the known bands that many have already mentioned in this thread.
Many local bands, whether they have been named in this thread or not, compose songs that sound functional instead of artistic or evocative (to borrow ‘evocative’ from the same musician again). By functional, it is in the sense that, if they do not write any songs, they would merely be a cover band. That means their songs are, at best, uninspiring. That means there is not true artistic value that is contributed to the scene.
Somebody mentioned Nirvana. Did Kurt Cobain foresee that their music would change the course of rock ‘n’ roll (as Dave Grohl once cited while inebriated) when he was writing the songs? No, I doubt so, and because he became disillusioned at their own success. But I dare guess that he wanted the group to be artists, and not just another band. Look at how Red Hot Chili Peppers broke out in the early 90s. John Frusciante is deeply influenced by Jimi Hendrix, and even if you can hear traces of Hendrix’s influence on his guitar-playing, Chili Peppers have their own signature sound. Look at the effect Rage Against The Machine produced with their own brand of rock and rap, made all the more interesting with Tom Morello’s signature guitar-playing and the rhythmic groove that underlies their tracks. Were there any bands like them before they came around? These are people who have independent thought and who raised the bar with true artistic value.
Hence, for the matter of the local scene being generic (as was mentioned by the thread starter), it is important for the players in it to hold independent thought and focus on artistic value, instead of merely wanting to be in a band. Somebody made a good point earlier in this thread when he suggested that people here ‘just [have] generally boring mediocre taste in music’ and that ‘all flows from there’. Many people here should discover music other than that dished out by the local media. We should really look at what is negative about local bands and avoid these negative points for ourselves. We should strive to be original, focus on artistry, and produce signature sounds or styles that do not easily remind the audience of any other well-known bands. Criticisms should be provided in good spirit and the bands in question should keep an open mind and really reflect on what they might be doing negatively. It really does not help if people in general are too willing to accept lower standards or mediocrity. But perhaps a little of that acceptance at this moment in our scene is necessary while, hopefully, more inspiring and original bands capable of stimulating the scene emerge. Right now, it is probably the case that there are more mediocre ‘clone bands’ than there are inspiring and original bands.
The scene is made up of bands, and bands are made up of individuals. Hence it starts with the individual and it is important for the individual to focus on true artistic value for the scene to improve.
This is not a research paper or a book and hence some points might be general. But it has been written in good faith.