Multi-effects or Individual stompboxes?

EugeneSmasher

New member
Hi everyone, I'm in a dilemma now but I know the pros and cons of either. So yeah maybe some opinions here from fellow guitarists would clear my mind a bit.

As the title says, do you prefer a multi-effects processor or a pedalboard of individual stompboxes? And you reason for it too.
 
i think it depends on how good ur multfx is? but for me too many fx only makes me more confused. so i stick to singles.
 
Depends on the amp too, though. Mine is a 10-watter and has no modulation or delay. The gain is also quite limited, more in the Vox / Fender league than the Mesa Boogie / Marshall / Peavey league.

So for me I have no choice but to rely solely on a separate multi-effects processor.
 
Well personally i believe its depends on individual preferences.....what are the type of music you play, the effects you need and etc etc...do consider them first only then do your research on the stompboxes and multi-effects....after that eliminate those that is unnecessary from your range of choices, check your budget then go get it.
I hope its simple enuff for ya dude....Good luck.
 
i think almost every guitarist from any genre will have little number of pedals in their boards.cause they got amps that can beat any stupid analog pedal hands down.
 
In my case, I will buy a high gain amp, EG: H&K Triamp, Dual Rectifier, etc… Then erm….a multi-effects like Line6 MM4 or G-System for modulations, an OD to kick the amp even harder, a wah, a vol pedal, then im done.
 
when it comes to single pedals, don't get intimidated by other people's gigantic pedal board or $etup.

Its actually quite simple. Just buy what you need.
If you dont have enough then slowly save lah, its single pedals what, can slowly get one by one.

- - - -
when it comes to multi-efx, it might have a ton of bells and whistles and what not. but at the end of the day, its still about getting what you need.

having 78 diiferent modulations, 54 different kind of reverbs ain't gona do you any good either unless meet your needs.

sometimes when choosing a multi-fx, one can get easily swayed by that particular "one" or "two" functions that really appeal to you. e.g phase trainer, or drum machine, or harmony generator or some whacky pitch shifting.

After playing with it for a while the novelty wears off and then all of a sudden there it is, one more entry in soft's classifieds. So choose wisely. been there done that. LoL so just sharing some of the past mistakes I've made.
 
i'm with multi effectors.

buy a good multi effect that suits u..
i found zoom pretty damn good for me. used to think that multi can't "push" as far as single effects, but thats not really true.


$$:
think about it. buying single effects can only give those few sounds, dun have much variations and genres. but given the same budget, u can buy a multi effector that can let u play almost everything possible.


genres:
beginners who haven't found their genres are recommended to get multi.
cuz u can't do much genres with limited singles.


noise:
the more pedals u go through, the more noise u will produce. its super obvious if u do recording.
a multi would reduce the noise of course, since no matter how many effects u go through, its only considered as "one-piece".


speed/troublesome:
switching variations. how fast can u switch your sound in real time?
single effects - 2seconds? not including stepping on wrong pedals and turning of knobs(changing of effect parameters by bending forward and tweaking knobs)
multi effectors - 0.007seconds patch change. includes turning of knobs.


negative side of multis:
sadly.. there's one thing my zoom can't do. the delay trails.. or whatever u call it..
means u tweak your delay parameters when its having the delay on.. u will get this very interesting sound.. that is something i wanted to play with..
so my plan is to combine both multi and single effectors together..
ITS ANALOG DELAYS MAN! hahaha..


i would say, with a decent multi, u might sound better than certain combinations of singles.


oh yes seekz, i agree with u.. please do not make the mistake i made too.. looking at functions isn't the right thing u should be doing. its the tone that matters! i bought my zoom because i see on youtube that u can do a double whammy cuz zoom has this double pedal thing.. after playing it for half an hour.. i never play with that function anymore...
 
Last edited:
i'm with multi effectors.

noise:
the more pedals u go through, the more noise u will produce. its super obvious if u do recording.
a multi would reduce the noise of course, since no matter how many effects u go through, its only considered as "one-piece".

Two words : quality cables!
I've given up on multi effects cause it was too intoxicating to tweak here and there to get the desired sound..

And also, a multi effects unit will always be a multi effects unit.. Cheap and easy to cycle through your patches, which makes it easy to get the same sound over, and over, and over, and over, and over again..

With single pedals, its responsive to the AMP it goes through and the GUITAR too.. You can have a few variations of sounds you want, but hell.. Get what you need then! You don't need 5 TS type of pedals on your board right?

Plug a $200 guitar into a multi effects unit, and the sound would be great.. Plug a $2000 dollar guitar into a multi effects unit, and.. Wait.. Doesn't it sound the same to the $200 one? Well, this is the impression I had when I was trying out some mfx units..
 
ya..i didn't think about the $200 and $2000 thing before..cuz i think all guitar sounds different..

i'm more on the beginner side..as in i would try very hard to spent as little cash as possible to sound like a pro..
didn't think about from pro becoming even more pro..
get what i mean?

yes..big multi are hard to tweak..it took me 4 hours to get a patch..hahaha..but after that session, i know my effects very well already..

the reason i bought my zoom was because of kiko loureiro. now i find myself quite silly..

after seeing godspeed's view.. i think my recommendations is.. beginner..get multi..after u found your genre and the type of music u really wanna do..then get singles..
 
after seeing godspeed's view.. i think my recommendations is.. beginner..get multi..after u found your genre and the type of music u really wanna do..then get singles..

:oops: A view is still just a view! Multi effect units are great in their own ways..
Very very affordable, and gives solid tone.. It can't venture out of its own field (eg. self oscillating fuzzes, mixing and matching ODs + Fuzz + Distortions), but still gives a reliable tone that you can depend on in the jamming studio, while performing, and at home..

If the multi effects offer what you need, the "ideal" tone for you, then single effects are a no-no.. If the multi-effects is brilliant sounding, but you still cant nail that tone, then experiment with single pedals! :mrgreen:
 
I can't resist putting my MFX back into the mainlines as it makes my Sound Drive sound like a Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifier. But truly its much more economical and convenient to use multi-effects. I've found my tones with mine already.

Surprisingly my Floor Pod is actually very easy to use, saving patches, etc, once I get the hang of it.
 
For me, as a typical Singaporean, I look at practicality. If I had a comfortable budget, I would really get those top-of-the-range tube amps and experiment with lots of boutique or modified pedals with mojo, and for performances, I’d get my own transport for my half stack (or full stack) etc. This is because analogues keeps your original signal alive, ie the output is your original signal modified. Digital on the other hand, takes your input, kill it totally and reproduce a similar signal of what the processor thinks should be the modified version. There’s a slight difference but not a great one because emulating technology is improving fast.

However, that remains on my wish list. I fall back to my current situation and look at what I'm doing now. I have al cheapo budget (tight but not non-existent) and I want consistency in terms of tone and volume control when I am performing with my band. We’ve got no sound man to tweak our volume on the PA and I don’t have a kick-ass amp I can bring around (even if I do, I live on the 8th floor of a HDB and the lifts are on the 6th and the 11th floors so…). What can I do to get what I need? Single effects, a volume pedal and pray that the locations in which I’m performing has the specific amps I want? Use the clean channel on the amps and rely solely on stomp box distortions? That would truly be limiting myself especially when I require big wall of cabs type of distortions.

That’s why I recently turned to multi-effects (I use to condemn these “shits” due to a false impression that all of them suck and sound “digital”… So much for listening to snobs who listened from snobs who listened from snobs who were influenced by snobs.) I was a bit more open to multi-effects units when some of my friends acquired them and we sat around playing with the sound. One thing we noticed were how powerful the modulations were and how ugly sounding the distortions were without a good amp and cab simulation.

Keeping the weakness of multi-effects in mind (mainly drive tones) I went to seek out multi-effects with an external effects loop such as the Boss GT-8 and the Pod X3 Live. I’m currently using the Pod X3 Live and to my surprise, the amp and cab simulation responded very well to my stomp box distortions in the external effects loop.

Now, whoever said single effects should never be used in conjunction with a multi-effects or amp/cab simulators? I’d advise you to balance out what you want, rather deciding purely from facts on paper. Don’t be fooled or swayed by people giving biased one-sided views on either type of pedals. Different multi-effects, like single effects counterparts, have many differences. A Pod XT and a Pod X3 is different, just like how a ds-2 and a ds-1 is different. Just like you can't say Boss suck, Roland suck, Gibson suck and guitars suck, you can't say multi-effects suck nor can you say single effects suck. One advise is to avoid cheap and entry-level multi-effects units because if you think about it, a multi-effects unit is already “very cheap” for the effects you are getting.
 
Last edited:
I started out using a mutifx pedalboard for the shear variety of effects available.

But then I bought a few other single effect pedals like METAL ZONE (woohoo) coz I can't get the distortions I want from the multifx. Anyways, my Zoom 4040 (old shit) can control(switch on and off) and incorporate the effects from an analog pedal into an effects patch which is awesome cos I can create a few Metal zone patches (for example).

But essentially, my multifx is there for it's tuner, volume pedal and some chorus/mod effects.

If you're a beginner, I'd definitely recommend a multifx pedal for the chance to play around and experiment with a variety of guitar effects. Then if you find the effects a little bit 'weak', you should try out the single pedals.

Oh.. and try finding a multifx pedal with an additional in/out to add in an analog pedal.

Cheers
 
mfx vs stomp boxes

in the real world a pair of good cables... a dist/od unit, wah and chorus is all you need to play and finish a night's gig... given the house' amps are decent sounding... eg... Twins, JCs or Boogies...
but if you are playing at least 40-50 songs per gig/night and a bit picky and you want to at least complement the song with a certain guitar tone/sound... then go for MFXs...

stomp boxes >>> light and portable
MFXs >>> a bit heavy...

either way... it is how you use it and tweak it to make it sound like shit or sound like a pro and sit well in the mix...

conclusion : it all in the fingers... :):):)
 
yes.. portability is the problem i facing now too..

multi effects:
too small -> not powerful enough
too big -> u won't wanna bring around

thats y..its always good to have a couple of compact singles with u.. like distortion kind.
so u can still survive a jamming session without having to bring the multi effects.. then during big events then u bring your full gear.
 
Back
Top