daryl
New member
follow the rules, yes, but not rules that aren't necessary. not rules that are based on prejudice the society holds. by enforcing such rules, schools are promoting that prejudice.
now i believe we are talking about long hair. not tattoos. not piercings. agree with your uniform example but that doesn't relate to this issue. you seem to be pushing the points on the uniform rule onto the rule against long hair. which is extremely misleading and i believe a very illogical sequence.
name me the reasons why schools have rules on long hair for guys, don't you? name me one that isn't based on prejudice.
also, please let me know how guys having short hair would benefit society? uniformity? bleah, hair does not denote social class in any way. hair does not segregate. unless you're referring to division in the trivial case of short hair and long hair. then i must say i don't understand you at all.
now i believe we are talking about long hair. not tattoos. not piercings. agree with your uniform example but that doesn't relate to this issue. you seem to be pushing the points on the uniform rule onto the rule against long hair. which is extremely misleading and i believe a very illogical sequence.
name me the reasons why schools have rules on long hair for guys, don't you? name me one that isn't based on prejudice.
also, please let me know how guys having short hair would benefit society? uniformity? bleah, hair does not denote social class in any way. hair does not segregate. unless you're referring to division in the trivial case of short hair and long hair. then i must say i don't understand you at all.
Last edited: