All IbAnEz JEM lovers in here!~ on the double!~
- Thread starter bigrockshow
- Start date
xklusivly4u
New member
Re: Hmm
it needs some colors.
neuro182 said:
it needs some colors.
xklusivly4u
New member
Re: Hmm
like gold in 7V.
neuro182 said:
like gold in 7V.
wangdexian
New member
The half vine is ugly, price tag is ridiculous when I can get a Prestige RG for that kind of money.
xklusivly4u
New member
wangdexian said:
100 percent agree! and lousy bridge some more
xklusivly4u
New member
Re: JS vs JEM
so 7WH doesn't stand out?? interesting!!
neuro182 said:Gold doesnt stand out well as a color for guitar, imo.
I'm quite imressed with Joe Satch's mirror guitar, JS600CH (whole guitar like a mirror man).
I found a similar one one JEM...
Enjoy.
so 7WH doesn't stand out?? interesting!!
jeremyrozario
New member
Re: Hmm
im assuming u toking abt mi fav jem of all, the jem 7d, the 1 with the black textured body and mirror pickguard
anw if i'm not wrong the jem 555 is a jem 555, and a jem333 is a jem jr
neuro182 said:
im assuming u toking abt mi fav jem of all, the jem 7d, the 1 with the black textured body and mirror pickguard
anw if i'm not wrong the jem 555 is a jem 555, and a jem333 is a jem jr
pooo
New member
Even so, even avid Jem fans don't dig the Jem555.
Quoted of Jemsite(hits/misses section):
"JEM555WH - See below. I separated the WH/BK and nominated the white as the worst. Why? Because it looks like a JEM7VWH ripoff. Many uninformed dealers can't tell the difference and same goes for Ebay sellers. Ibanez, please put this out to pasture."
"JEM555BK - to purists, these are not really JEMs. The headstock reads "JEM Jr" so this should tell you something right off the bat. The Korean made connotation doesn't help matters either. In all actuality these are fine guitars, so if you're on a tight budget and demand a new JEM, you have no other choice. The problem with this series is twofold: First, Ibanez has mistakenly left off the Lo-Pro Edge tremolo (which is the best in the business) and replaced it with the totally inferior Lo-TRS. Secondly, they stopped the vine inlay at fret 12, using dots the rest of the way. Having owned my first JEM in '88, I do know that these do not compare to the JEM7 series. These are anti collectable. I'd prefer that the model had never been created, but who am I to say. For Lefties, it's your only choice however as lefty 555LWH will ship soon."
Quoted of Jemsite(hits/misses section):
"JEM555WH - See below. I separated the WH/BK and nominated the white as the worst. Why? Because it looks like a JEM7VWH ripoff. Many uninformed dealers can't tell the difference and same goes for Ebay sellers. Ibanez, please put this out to pasture."
"JEM555BK - to purists, these are not really JEMs. The headstock reads "JEM Jr" so this should tell you something right off the bat. The Korean made connotation doesn't help matters either. In all actuality these are fine guitars, so if you're on a tight budget and demand a new JEM, you have no other choice. The problem with this series is twofold: First, Ibanez has mistakenly left off the Lo-Pro Edge tremolo (which is the best in the business) and replaced it with the totally inferior Lo-TRS. Secondly, they stopped the vine inlay at fret 12, using dots the rest of the way. Having owned my first JEM in '88, I do know that these do not compare to the JEM7 series. These are anti collectable. I'd prefer that the model had never been created, but who am I to say. For Lefties, it's your only choice however as lefty 555LWH will ship soon."
neuro182
New member
Hmm
Check this site out man -> http://www.ibanezregister.com/
A site for Ibanez lovers (regardless of race, language or MODELS).
Check this site out man -> http://www.ibanezregister.com/
A site for Ibanez lovers (regardless of race, language or MODELS).
subversion
Moderator
another probe- will you then purchase a JEM because of the Steve Vai factor? if not (looks aside) what then is your reason?
Similar threads
