For the mixer, after connecting all the mics? The mixer link to the com? Using?
That said, the Toneport doesn't capture accurately the quality of what you hear off your amp. Most of the clips I hear tend to be compressed and has a certain voice to it.
i rikes hank marvin. he was my guitar hero when i saw him on tv with apache and another song. he's got seriously nice strat tone and subtle use of the tremolo bar.
Would the toneport be similar to... a Roland Microcube?
If I'm reading what Thor says... its like... running efx into the Toneport sounds like how a Microcube takes pedals.
Anything going in sounds cold-er... more "digital-ised" / compressed
You know, I would have made a recording on my UX2 just to let everyone hear it and be the judge of that. Problem is that I JUST got my first electric guitar and have no pedals, so I think it would be an embarassment to let you hear any of my playing![]()
Would the toneport be similar to... a Roland Microcube?
If I'm reading what Thor says... its like... running efx into the Toneport sounds like how a Microcube takes pedals.
Anything going in sounds cold-er... more "digital-ised" / compressed.
I have to say, the PODXTLive does take pedals quite well. I was pleasantly surprised...
But I'm curious. WHY would anyone need to use extra efx with a POD? Doesn't it already have everything?
Well, some ppl have pedalboards/efx liao mah... so just need that interface to connect to their recording devices/pc.
But I'm curious. WHY would anyone need to use extra efx with a POD? Doesn't it already have everything?
My 5 cents of thought:
Recording with a mic can be pure frustration. There're probably very few places in your house to record quiet, big, spacious sounds. And then most of us will be really bad at mic placement and stuff.
Then wouldn't a simple DI box suffice?