Our attitude towards brand name

Pertaining to brand name...

  • I prefer a renowned brand name

    Votes: 18 14.8%
  • Willing to try a no-namer

    Votes: 8 6.6%
  • I have intentions to re-sell, brand name helps

    Votes: 16 13.1%
  • Will go with quality stuff, it's not about brand name

    Votes: 64 52.5%
  • It's about having $$$ & the ability to acquire...

    Votes: 16 13.1%

  • Total voters
    122

subversion

Moderator
Friends 8-)

please share why you are/ not particular about brand names. would you buy a superb no-namer or a mediocre boutique product?
 
Anything works for me. If it sounds good, and i dig it. And i have the cash, it appears on my board or with me.
 
tone is number 1 factor.
but if after 1 year the guitar spoils, no use. so build should come before tone for me...
 
i think.

higher brand...TEND to have higher quality

but my friend's J Suzuki les paul copy has awesome quality.

so, i guess cheaper brands do not necessarily equate to poor quality.
 
I would go for the feel, as tone wise doesn't really matter to me though, so I'll get any guitar which works for me. A guitar which feels comfortable under my arms would inspire me to play more! :)
 
as expensive brands slack in terms of quality, and cheap brands catching up in workmanship, brand names serve to deceive us (and our wallets)..
i'd go for tone.. of course, a well-known brand would always be viewed with higher regard..
 
for me its always the case of if it can get the job done as well as, then why not. If the product sounds good and feels good then I'd go for it.

But of course in some cases nothing can beat the ones with the 'name'.
 
i believe reknowned brands tend to have better quality and better build hence being 'better' or more reknowned. however this is not always the case as we are experiencing right now, other 'sub standard' brands being higly compeitive in the gear area.

for me, its all abt the sense of ownership. would i want to buy a burny when i have enough gas for a gibson? definetly not. however if the burny plays better then a gibson y not right? at the end, its how u feel about the guitar and whether its worth the bang for your buck. (note: im not saying burnys play better then gibsons in anyway. just a refernece point)
 
i think pickup, electronics, etc can all be changed, but the real meat and bones of the guitar - the body, must be good.

some brands tend to be quite consistent about the build quality of their guitar bodies, especially MIJ guitars like ESP, Fender Japan and Ibanez MIJs. I find US brands are a little less consistent, both in build quality like 70s Gibsons and post-CBS Fenders, as well as in changes in design such as the large-heel PRS design. I think these are generally quite minor issues though, and overall US guitars are very good.

in general my order of preference is Japanese guitars, then US guitars, then Korean guitars, then anything else. ultimately though, bottom line is the body must be good, everything else can be changed.

i tried some ESP guitars yesterday and might i just say that between a US and Japanese version of the same model, both guitar bodies felt almost identical aside from the US one being in gloss finish and the Japanese one being a satin/matt finish. neck profile was identical. even the body weight was probably very close, though admittedly it's a little hard to gauge just by holding it.

that was pretty impressive. most guitar companies i know don't have such uniform build quality across different manufacturing countries. perhaps it was coincidence, i won't know till i am able to try more variants of the model from both US and Japan. but i have to say i was really quite impressed. as a side note, the electronics and hardware were all top notch, which was a plus.

but the body. seriously. try one, it's quite sexy.
 
For me, i got a problem paying few k for guitars like gibson n us fenders, when i know that i can get realli good guitars for alot cheaper. Of course, playing a gbby les paul is surely sweet but i rather save on the difference n buy lawsuit guitars that r also realli kickass n use the remaining $ for something else.

But then when it comes to amps, im more willing to spend lol.

wierd
 
During one of the Swee Lee sales, I got hold of a sweet looking Cort acoustic and was queuing up to pay for it. I was chatting with a guy behind me, and he asked what I was getting. I held up the Cort and showed it to him, and at one look at the head stock his immediate advice was: 'cort ah? get ibanez or fender lah, better.'

He didn't even give it a chance ):

I didn't take that advice though, and till now I've had no regrets whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Sub, allow me to just shed my thoughts on this issue.

Branding or positioning is a pseudo-marketing tool that almost always works.We, as consumers in this industry can be easily read as numbers or stats in the whole scheme of things.

Rational benefits, the personality(e.g-Gibson-Fender-Ibanez are all in the rock and roll hall of fame), the character of the product(originality,innovativeness,vintage mojority), the delivery of expectations(consistency), the continuity of the company(long history is better than no history to the majority of us), quality reliability(maximum 2 out of 10 may be lemons/duds,its a norm la) and pricing-etc all play an important role when we as consumers make our shopping decisions.

So basically, it boils down to demographics. Which target segment would deem what as more important to them?I take it that you mean forumers of soft.com as a whole, as one singular demography?

e.g

20 yr old hard-luck musician($300-$500 axe) vs 20 yr old son of rich man(Fender Custom shop)
30 yr old unemployed(less than $500 axe) vs 30 yr old banker($3000 above axe)

I know a musician who doesnt make much money as a guitarist here but had saved close to 3K to get a Martin Acoustic, why?Because to him, its well worth it as compared to other guitars worth less than half the price.It's pretty subjective.

Also, interestingly, I feel that sometimes in all the decisions we make, we think we are being objective rather than relying solely on blind faith, but at the end of the day, we may tend to compromise our actions with the intangible influence of being over-compensating whilst making a decision between two options.

Sort of like reverse-snobbism.
 
if the consumer world deem us as meer statistics, let it be. the objective here is to consider if brand snobbery transcend the educated mentality or demographics- seems that it does at both front. it's the branding psyche that generates the propensity to buy in this capitalist domain.
 
yes we are all aptly-put deemed as mere statistics.

And statistics and target demographic segmentation by itself proves that even the component "snobbish mentality folks" are by itself a brick in the proverbial wall of demographics. Meaning- They themselves are considered as a seperate demography in this consumer-market.

Low spending power
High spending power
Quality conscious
Brand Conscious
Needs-based consumers
Brand Loyalists
Etc
Etc

Mix and Match them all.
 
Back
Top