I have no idea if this is a misconception or is it a factual statement. In reality, it seems as though that this statement is very much a fact. Sometimes when people ask me if i can play jazz and i say i can't, they immediately ask me for my grade for piano, if i give them a low grade they would kinda keep emphasising that jazz is like the highest form of piano skill that a good pianist can aquire.I wonder is that true?Is it only when you can be able to play jazz on the piano, then you can be considered to be a relatively good pianist?
I understand that jazz really sounds and looks good when one plays it on the piano or even on the guitar for that matter. I want to know what's so 'prestigious' about knowing how to play jazz on the piano.Maybe on my part, i do not really know how to appreciate this particular genre, thus i seem to not place much interest in learning it. However, people around me seem to be really into this jazz thing, and if one can't play it, it just basically shows that one can't really play good stuff on the piano.Is this statement justifiable?
Please feel free to comment on this subject, no offence though to people who appreciate jazz, i'm just thrashing out stuff which i feel seems pretty vague to me.
I understand that jazz really sounds and looks good when one plays it on the piano or even on the guitar for that matter. I want to know what's so 'prestigious' about knowing how to play jazz on the piano.Maybe on my part, i do not really know how to appreciate this particular genre, thus i seem to not place much interest in learning it. However, people around me seem to be really into this jazz thing, and if one can't play it, it just basically shows that one can't really play good stuff on the piano.Is this statement justifiable?
Please feel free to comment on this subject, no offence though to people who appreciate jazz, i'm just thrashing out stuff which i feel seems pretty vague to me.