Even a post that is suppose to inspire becomes a war zone. Sheesh...
Jerseystar, I realise the whole point of your post is to put into the scope of reality what music is; a passion that at most time doesn't put food on the table or money in the pocket. It won't help to lessen the torture at a concentration camp or Guantanamo Bay. And it will certainly won't cure illnesses.
At least not in itself.
These ailments and survival needs puts us in the same category as every living thing on this earth. We hunt for our food, we shelter ourselves from the weather, we breed, we move, sleep and we die.
We are as much like every animal out there.
So why isit that we invented and keep on having music as part of our daily lives? It serves us no physical purpose. I think that's the point of the speech you're missing out: beyond the physical needs of our body, we have mental and spiritual needs as well. One of the most universal nourishments that we have for that plane of ours is music.
Does it provide us physical shelter, food on our table, cure for our sickness? Of course not. But music brings people together to celebrate, mourn, build or break. Plenty of music festivals are dedicated in creating awareness about the plights of the unfortunate, or the environment, or the political injustice of countries. And to me awareness is the first step to saving people's lives, or changing unjustified perceptions, or bringing improvements to social/political/eco landscapes; everything else is an effect of it thereafter.
When reading the first post, never did I consider it to be a speech about music as a promising career. He never did say it was a promising career. The whole point is about finding a true purpose about why one is pursuing music.
"You’re not here to become an entertainer, and you don’t have to sell yourself. The truth is you don’t have anything to sell; being a musician isn’t about dispensing a product, like selling used Chevies. I’m not an entertainer; I’m a lot closer to a paramedic, a firefighter, a rescue worker. You’re here to become a sort of therapist for the human soul, a spiritual version of a chiropractor, physical therapist, someone who works with our insides to see if they get things to line up, to see if we can come into harmony with ourselves and be healthy and happy and well."
Granted, those who are able to say that their music is their career are the very few. Someone who is rich enough? Someone who won American Idol? Someone who was there at the right place at the right time?
But do realise that they, took the risk to plunge in, with the chances for a failure to succeed extremely high. Hundreds or thousands others are like these people, with or without music education, with or without knowledge of an instrument. Are they to blame music cos of failure to succeed in it? I don't think that should be the case, because it was a choice to risk what they could have gotten. These are the folks who want to be entertainers, sellers of their ownself so that they will be idolised and worshiped. Their purpose was not about making sure the music is the spiritual resource that will feed minds and souls.
These are the kind of people that shouldn't be at the school. That is the point of his speech.
I understand that perhaps you are embittered by the struggle you went through to get through music education. And guess what, I was somewhat in your shoes. Pursued an education in music at Lasalle before dropping out because I couldn't afford the fees. Lasted only 1 semester. They didn't even show me my exam results cos I didn't pay the fees that's due to me. My situation wasn't as bad as yours, and I salute you for going through what you did and still stand tall.
But in no way did I think that speech was bullocks. It gave me a reason as to why I am still doing this, at the end of the day I have my own spirit to nourish. But if I can profoundly change the world for the better with what I do, that's a bonus.
2 cents.