templar03
Member
Remakes mostly suck. The only redeeming factor is that they add more tits to it. Dawn of the Dead remake is an exception.
More.. tits??
Gore you mean?
Remakes mostly suck. The only redeeming factor is that they add more tits to it. Dawn of the Dead remake is an exception.
Don't know if any of you guys here have seen "Dead Set" before. It was quite crazy and gore too.
Remakes mostly suck. The only redeeming factor is that they add more tits to it. Dawn of the Dead remake is an exception.
A few films I actually watched the remakes before the originals and when I watched the originals I liked the remakes better. I actually loved the Texas Chainsaw remake and prequel, and the Hills Have Eyes remake(sequel sucked bad though). I guess people in the 70s were just starting to get used to blood and gore to a whole new level after Night of the Living Dead, so these films still shocked them. But I think guys who are in their early 20s and younger will probably prefer the remakes. But good luck making a better Evil Dead(without Ash) or Child's Play or NOES. Those originals were just too good.
I collect horror divx movies in my com =)
Dude, cannibal holocaust? That is one sick movie.
Avid fan of Stephen King, I am. Watched both shows (two of the King's highly acclaimed films).
Incidentally, the book (set of 4 novellas) whence Shawshank came from contained two other highly rated films - Stand By Me and Apt Pupil..
The actor who played Percy (of Shawshank) is suitably typecast as an evil-short-irritating prick. He even played a (similarly-hated) paedophile in CSI series. It could be his smirk.
=&=