Gear News 07 (Domestic)

Status
Not open for further replies.
RG headstock:

-----|
----||
---|||
--||||
-|||||
||||||
EADGBE

notice the low-E string slack is short, and the hi-E string slack is long.
(slack, as in, the length of string from the nut to the tunning peg. Some pple do play there, for fun.)

RGR headstock:

|
||
|||
||||
|||||
||||||
EADGBE

here, the low-E string slack is long, and the hi-E string slack is short.

RGR headstock is not just about a reverse design, the overall string dynamics is also different okay... :lol:

Sub, in other words, BUY BUY BUY. Purchase further justified. 8)
 
are these with locking nuts?

if you're locking the strings at the nut, i don't think ANY headstock config will make a difference.
 
My USACG neck is reverse. And its for a floyd rose equipped guitar.

Uh.

Yes... no diff in feel lah.. its locked @ the nut... it just looks cool.
 
confirmed not finger. I have been trying, but so far hard to hoax the sound of endless delay riding on the wave of long reverb decay that goes right in on the audio input which in turn send a spike of control voltage to act as carrier in of a ring mod.

i have been cheated on it, whoever told me tone is in the finger. Screw them :cry:
 
u tried digging yet? maybe touch the strings not enough, takes more effort to get your desired tone they say :x
 
RG321 and RGR321 are not using locking nuts. Perhaps my string dynamics theory still applies for these two? :wink:
 
to me there's nothing superior/ inferior about a reverse headstock, the guitar itself must sound good, otherwise, no use buying...
 
yy

MTM-2
P2100765.jpg


P2100749.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top