ClueJ
New member
i think prodip is right. the tix were a bit too expensive. and when the flyers came out ard mid june, there was only like 1 or 2 weeks for the 55 tix before it became 65. i think that shows that the organisers were new in doing gigs. should publicize much earlier and made the tix $35,$45 n 55 at door just like woj.
the main thing when organising gigs i think is about doing it for the scene first and not the money. maybe shld just set the tix so that its just nice to cover the rentals, etc. whats important is that u get in the crowds in the first gig, and more and more crowds in future then maybe u can up the price a bit for a lil bit of profit. bands playin in gigs shouldn't be the same in every/most gigs (thats what i notice in some gigs) just because the organiser is their "members". organisers should put different bands new/old/popular/not too popular so that there's exposure and more balance. one way the organisers can find bands is by searching thru the music section in Myspace under sg. even crowds get bored when they hear that the same bands are performing again and again. i hope my opinion will change the mindset of gig organisers. peace!
the main thing when organising gigs i think is about doing it for the scene first and not the money. maybe shld just set the tix so that its just nice to cover the rentals, etc. whats important is that u get in the crowds in the first gig, and more and more crowds in future then maybe u can up the price a bit for a lil bit of profit. bands playin in gigs shouldn't be the same in every/most gigs (thats what i notice in some gigs) just because the organiser is their "members". organisers should put different bands new/old/popular/not too popular so that there's exposure and more balance. one way the organisers can find bands is by searching thru the music section in Myspace under sg. even crowds get bored when they hear that the same bands are performing again and again. i hope my opinion will change the mindset of gig organisers. peace!