abortion

the government should endorse this thread to support the "prevent teen pregnancy" to "low birthrates" with whitestrat as ambassador.

stick the fingers into the wall socket <-- 8-10 second full electrocution kid victim here.

thank you for sharing the experience. I'm in my mid 20s and a long way to go but won't be too far off to experience 1st hand.
 
seekz : I think whitestrat is painting both sides of the picture here. infact all realistic sides. rather than oppose. cos I've been through alot myself and he's been through more than both of us as a parent, a "been-there-done-that" stage.

if you've read all 10+ pages, you'll realise I'm obviously the one who doesn't believe in casting a vote for not allowing someone to live. I antagonize johnf but I still try to keep my point valid, hopefully. because society's discrimination is a lot more merciless than what I've said so far.

there're some who're trying to joke to lighten the serious mood , like throwing ice water on a heated moshpit , which is cool.
and there're some on for the abortion because your own life should be cherished more than allowing a mistake to end all freedom.just "guilt + learn from mistake".
 
Whitestrat:
This is a life and death matter, I don't wish to argue over.
Debates like this break out all the time, and I don't wish
to engage in one with you.

Yes, it is a life and death matter. Who's life? Not yours. so it is obviously easy to take the simple and PC answer to say "keep the baby".

Have you lost a child? have you had a child? No? I HAVE. BOTH. Then don't talk to me about life and death over a foetus that hasn't developed consiousness. Don't try to preach about things you do not know about.

You call out my points in my previous post, and label them as rubbish. :rolleyes: Now I call you out to ask why, and you walk away...
 
Last edited:
the government should endorse this thread to support the "prevent teen pregnancy" to "low birthrates" with whitestrat as ambassador.

The Govt has many agendas for many different purposes. On one hand, they are promoting increased childbirth rates. On the other hand, they promote family values that DOES NOT INCLUDE SINGLE UNWED MOTHERS.

It's true. The govt does not actively support mothers who are not married, but does set up support structures for children, as it is really not their fault.

But having worked in social service during my school days in the UK, I can tell you it is not something I would want to subject ANY child to. I've not seen the support facilities in SG, but any orphanage is depressing, no matter how they try to make it look sweet and innocent for the children.

Imagine growing up without parents. Or even worse, growing up with foster parents who adopted you before they could have a kid, and finally due to some miracle, they have their own child, and you become the spare tire. Not an experience I feel any child should go through.

stick the fingers into the wall socket <-- 8-10 second full electrocution kid victim here.

Tell me about it... you know how many heart attacks my wife and I have gone through? Lucky we bought the socket covers, but that hasn't stopped him from playing with the switches, WITH SALIVA LADEN FINGERS!!! ARRRGGHH!!!!!

thank you for sharing the experience. I'm in my mid 20s and a long way to go but won't be too far off to experience 1st hand.

Hahaha... Look forward to it man... It's life changing, but in a good way when your'e ready for it...;)

I think whitestrat is painting both sides of the picture here. infact all realistic sides. rather than oppose. cos I've been through alot myself and he's been through more than both of us as a parent, a "been-there-done-that" stage.

I am not pro-abortion, don't get me wrong. I think it should be used responsibly and only at the last resort. But in many cases, sadly, it is abused.

I am pro-choice. There are those like Seekz who are totally against abortion. I can understand that on the moral terms. but I think in all cases, there must be a case-to-case basis of judgement. I believe the OP has every right to choose what he wants to do. So does his partner. But they have to learn to live with the decision.

I've thankfully not been on the side of an unwanted pregnancy, but I have lost a pregnancy before, and I know the pain that comes with it. So I am not saying it lightly when I said the OP should choose what's best for all of them, which might seem like the abortion at this time.
 
Last edited:
i'm a father of 2 beautiful gals...my 2nd was an "accident"...late withdrawal..hehehehe
nevertheless there were times during that pregnancy the thoughts of aborting it did cross me and my wifey..why...my 1st was about 1yr plus at that time, i've just got a HDB flat,my career was getting tough at that time etc etc...

financially we were "threading water" and the responsibilty of giving your best to another child...how should i put this...tough ??...

Bro, as one father to another, I say STEADY LAH!!! Well done! You're the kind of father we need more of! Housing commitments, carrer troubles, financial instablility, and a 2nd one on the way at that time... *ouch*

That's when we all realise that the Govt child "gift" doesn't help much does it? Hahahahaha...:mrgreen: They should give more man...:twisted:
 
Do not speak on my behalf, I'm not entirely against abortion.
And I also think in all cases, there must be a case-to-case basis
of judgement.

Nobody is forcing TS to "Keep the baby"
I did not CUT OUT YOUR POINTS and call them rubbish.

I said

"Taking the higher road by ending that little life, by not letting him/her
suffer." is rubbish.

You instead cut out my points to debate against.
So I say AGAIN to you right now, I do not wish to engage in
a debate with you over SOMEONE ELSE's LIFE

You sound like a Leaver.

I would feel like you're trying to target me or troll my posts
if you're gona keep this up.
 
"Taking the higher road by ending that little life, by not letting him/her
suffer." is rubbish.

Again, I ask. Why is this a higher road? What gave you that idea? I have already said they are both LOW ROADS. Yet, because I think I am so far the only one who has ever considered that abortion might be the viable route for the TS, and you point that out, doesn't that sound like you're referring to my posts?

I would feel like you're trying to target me or troll my posts
if you're gona keep this up.

What nonsense. I respond to almost EVERY post that refers to me in some form or another. What makes you so special that I'm trying to target you? do I know you? No. do you know me? No. Have I been to your shop? No.

So how have you been trolled by me?

Furthermore, my initial response was to a post made by YOUR COLLEAGUE, who no longer responds, and you pop in here with a posts that's almost anything else except friendly sounding.

Are YOU trying to troll me?
 
SeekZ and I (and others too) have given our opinions. We did not force them down the TS's throat and condemn his actions. We both respect his decision. We only lament that the couple has chosen to abort. I am sure there are others out there who are going through or have gone through the same situation and we SOFTies have offered advice and shed some light on this matter.

WhiteStrat, I don't know what you have against us. We did not label ourselves as anti abortion because we both believe that it is also a choice. Like I mentioned, we are lamenting that johnf and his gf chose abortion. We feel sad but it is their decision.

You certainly have more parenting experience but there is no need to be patronizing because you have that experience. You painted a very grim picture, telling us that life under social services and being adopted is painful and tough. Perhaps you believe so because you have seen such situations in person. However, I believe that there are also happy couples and adopted children living together. I have read such articles and saw these success stories on the news as well. I feel that that adoption could go both ways.

I hope we can end this discussion on a cordial note. We are not out to make enemies with you. We do not know each other personally so please do not make judgements on our behalf. We did not make any assumptions about you or targetted your views.

You can call us "leavers" if you wish. I chose not to partipate because the TS has already made his decision and there was no further need for us to comment.
 
The most dire and miserable of circumstances can be turned around into a fulfilling and spiritually-enriching experience,
simply with a flip of perspective
 
Last edited:
SeekZ and I (and others too) have given our opinions. We did not force them down the TS's throat and condemn his actions. We both respect his decision. We only lament that the couple has chosen to abort.

I think we ALL lament that he has chosen to abort.

Like I said, it is a difficult decision, and one should never be called on to make this choice. But it does happen, even for married couples who discover that their 4 month old baby has down syndrome. It's painful.

Look, I don't think I want to start another round of arguements about who said what since the posts are all in this thread and can be easily read if one wishes.

I'll take the first step. Maybe I misread your post and thought you came across strongly as a pro-abortionist. Maybe I misjudged that it seems as if your main point of arguement for the TS was that it was wrong to abort so he shouldn't. If so, I apologise if you did indeed mean what you just posted.

WhiteStrat, I don't know what you have against us.

I have nothing against both of you. To me, there was initially no "US". you were 2 separate individuals until Seekz himself asked about the trolling. That's when I put the 2 and 2 together. Again, perhaps I was wrong in assuming later that you are both posting in tandem. If so, I apologise again.

You certainly have more parenting experience but there is no need to be patronizing because you have that experience. You painted a very grim picture, telling us that life under social services and being adopted is painful and tough. Perhaps you believe so because you have seen such situations in person. However, I believe that there are also happy couples and adopted children living together. I have read such articles and saw these success stories on the news as well. I feel that that adoption could go both ways.

You're right, I don't have to be patronising. The reason I posted such was because I felt your initial post was childing the OP, with views that may not necessarily have been applicable. That's why, out of your entire post, I only quoted one part. Furthermore, it wasn't targeted specifically at you as a personal attack, but rather about that you feeling that JohnF should keep the baby because that's what you would do. I was pointing out that your view might not necessarily have been optimum for his situation. Again, I apologise if I came across too harsh.

Yes, adoptions do go on well in some cases. however for me, if there was a slim remote chance that something could go wrong for my child, I would refuse it. I personally don't like to take chances with my child's life.

I paint a grim picture because that's what it is. The TS needs to realise how SEVERE his decision is, and what's serious about it. It really is no laughing matter. While I appreciate the optimistic views of others, I feel that sometimes it is necessary to see the real world, which is really not as nice and sweet. Anything extra would be a bonus.

I hope we can end this discussion on a cordial note. We are not out to make enemies with you. We do not know each other personally so please do not make judgements on our behalf. We did not make any assumptions about you or targetted your views.
You can call us "leavers" if you wish. I chose not to partipate because the TS has already made his decision and there was no further need for us to comment.

I did not initally set out to make enemies either. Again I stress, to me, there was no "US" link between the 2 of you. Thus, my "leaver" comment was one of anger directed at Seekz. Read the tone of his post. Does it sound amicable? Like someone who really wants a peaceful solution? Had he spoken to me like you do now, I would have definately spoken with reason rather than emotion.

If you'd notice, I have removed the "leaver" remark because I felt that is was uncalled for, and should not have been made.

None of you have stated your actual beliefs, except to consistently tell the TS unconditionally not to abort. That would lead to a "pro-abortionist" assumption on my part.

Again, if this is mislead, I apologise.;)
 
I only made 3 posts.

The first one was to tell the TS not to assume the worst
when it comes to unwanted pregnancies. Its does not
necessarily destroys your life.

Clearly there are many who stepped up and shared their
own father-hood experiences to illustrate my point.

More importantly I wish to stress:
The message was only directed to the TS.

Why must I explain myself to you, Whitestrat.
For a point that I'm trying to put across to the TS.

I would have to take it that you've misread,
Because what followed was really unnecessary
as this is really not about you or me.

So I beg your pardon if I didn't sound friendly
in my second or third post.
 
Yes, we are all trying to give a little piece of advise to TS and hopefully help him in some ways which may eliminate his confusion and pain that the couple is going thru at this moment of time. But for seekz,we all know you are married,i personally don't know if you got a kid or not,so since you both don't know each other then why not just focus on TS? and for Seekz,you got a reputation to maintain,isn't it? you got a store or some online business last time i checked. Whatever it is, Soft may be a good place for music lovers. But for troubled people,i am sure there are other alternatives available in Society.
 
thanks to all who have given really realistic solutions..

i do not have any idea why this one idiot called me an ego (read the previous posts carefully).
if im an ego, i wouldnt even seek advices.and i merely posted a few replies here,and is that what made me an ego? listen to my tone from my post, do i sound like an ego.it is really stupid and blind to just rant ur mouth like that.
like i said, i read this thread everyday.


from the bottom of my heart, really,thank u for those who pm-ed me.at least they're some helpful souls out there.....

Sorry but i actually agree with blueprintstudios. Your mind is already set on abortion even before you started this thread. Your purpose is not to seek advise, but to gain support from people who agree with your decision. Either way, it's your decision. From your point of view, I can see that you don't want your kid to grow up knowing that he's a "mistake", but you're still killing someone dammit!
 
It'd be financially hard, mentally daunting, somewhat humiliating maybe? But it's your kid. His/her life is your responsibility once you brought it into this world. You wanted to have fun, now you have the unexpected consequences, your kid has to pay for it.

I don't understand how hard it is but all I know is that life is more important than just financial difficulties and other stuff. By killing 'em you'll just kill any chance of having any sort of miracle. You'll never know how things may turn out if you try to raise him, but by aborting you'll lose every chance of a blessing in disguise and the sort.

Just my 2cents, trying to save your child's life if you're reading this :)
 
Some quotes that I've found while flipping through my really old GP notes on abortion.

Against:

Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive. ~Unknown Author

Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born ~Ronald Reagan

If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people to not kill each other? Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. ~Mother Teresa

For:

If the anti-abortion movement took a tenth of the energy they put into noisy theatrics and devoted it to improving the lives of children who have been born into lives of poverty, violence, and neglect, they could make a world shine. ~Michael Jay Tucker

Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State ~Edward Abbey
 
Back
Top