Real world dream car poll.
- Thread starter Praetorian
- Start date
Praetorian
New member
The 97K one is the 2.7 Litre V6. There are three Tuscani models... 1.6, 2.2, 2.7.
All three are underpowered
No 2004 integra because, simply, it's nothing next to the old integra. The headlamps arent as good looking as before... plus it lacks the power.
All three are underpowered
No 2004 integra because, simply, it's nothing next to the old integra. The headlamps arent as good looking as before... plus it lacks the power.
Panopticon-3
New member
DoubleBlade said:
do you know you just said Singapore Bus Service Bus Service? lol
wangdexian
New member
I got Evo VII... Initial D Arcade Machine Game Card... haha :twisted:
Personally I like evos more than the WRXs... the new WRXs personally look REALLY ugly and beng. And Subaru is owned by General Motors (correct me if I'm wrong) and like other brands in the group, (Suzuki, Chevy) they are fuel sucking monsters.
Personally I like evos more than the WRXs... the new WRXs personally look REALLY ugly and beng. And Subaru is owned by General Motors (correct me if I'm wrong) and like other brands in the group, (Suzuki, Chevy) they are fuel sucking monsters.
Praetorian
New member
Evo all the way!!!!
Iono. I never liked WRX. The bug eyed generation put me off. Not to mention them being so darned common.
But that's just me. I'm an EVO person.
Iono. I never liked WRX. The bug eyed generation put me off. Not to mention them being so darned common.
But that's just me. I'm an EVO person.
Praetorian
New member
dhalif said:
:toimonster: :smt075 :smt064 :smt021 :smt019 :axe:
Praetorian
New member
pooo said:Evo person?!?! Why doesn't your 1550 have Evos in them in that case?
Good question. One I can't really answer. LOL. Maybe next time.
wangdexian
New member
Praetorian said:
Exactly! The bug eyes SUCK BIG time.
Praetorian
New member
Yeah man. The bug eyes were disgusting.
But it's all cool now. The WRX STi is a good car, I'll give them that. Might even outfight an Evo. But for me... Evo all the way.
Heard of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIIIMR FQ-400?
Most powerful stock Evo ever.
Engine: Turbocharged 2L Inline 4
Power: 405 bhp @ 6,800 RPM
Torque: 355 lb/ft @ 5,000 RPM
0 - 100: 3.5 sec
Top Speed: 282 kmh
Some common supercar 0 - 100 timings...
"This is enough to propel the FQ400 from 0-60 mph in an incredible 3.5 seconds and on to a top speed in excess of 175 mph. It is a performance that even some of the world’s most exotic supercars struggle to match. The £330,000 Porsche Carrera GT, for example, requires 3.9 seconds to sprint from 0-62 mph, while the ultra-exclusive Pagani Zonda needs 3.7 seconds. The BMW M3 – hitherto the benchmark ‘everyday supercar’ – takes 5.3 seconds to achieve the same feat."
And don't even THINK of Lamborghini's or Ferraris.
[/b]
But it's all cool now. The WRX STi is a good car, I'll give them that. Might even outfight an Evo. But for me... Evo all the way.
Heard of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIIIMR FQ-400?
Most powerful stock Evo ever.
Engine: Turbocharged 2L Inline 4
Power: 405 bhp @ 6,800 RPM
Torque: 355 lb/ft @ 5,000 RPM
0 - 100: 3.5 sec
Top Speed: 282 kmh
Some common supercar 0 - 100 timings...
"This is enough to propel the FQ400 from 0-60 mph in an incredible 3.5 seconds and on to a top speed in excess of 175 mph. It is a performance that even some of the world’s most exotic supercars struggle to match. The £330,000 Porsche Carrera GT, for example, requires 3.9 seconds to sprint from 0-62 mph, while the ultra-exclusive Pagani Zonda needs 3.7 seconds. The BMW M3 – hitherto the benchmark ‘everyday supercar’ – takes 5.3 seconds to achieve the same feat."
And don't even THINK of Lamborghini's or Ferraris.
[/b]
HeartRockSingapore
New member
What car are you guys driving?
Sorry James, don't meant to take this thing further away from music.
Sorry James, don't meant to take this thing further away from music.
Praetorian
New member
Nothing
Aiming a Tuscani though. Best bang for buck in my opinion.
Aiming a Tuscani though. Best bang for buck in my opinion.
HeartRockSingapore
New member
I still very happy with my old faithful Mercedes 1988 model.
live33
New member
Currently? Hmm... it's an amazing piece of engineering. Its skeletal structure is made up of 26 individual parts, 33 joints and powered by 19 engines. It employs a sophisticated suspension system that is like no other. In fact, I have 2 of them. It's called "feet". Ha..haha...
Think my first would have to be a Subaru Forester XT. Practical, safe, AWD... It seems like a very reliable car. And it's got a boxer! Cool! Better handling... But no manual for the XT version =(
Think my first would have to be a Subaru Forester XT. Practical, safe, AWD... It seems like a very reliable car. And it's got a boxer! Cool! Better handling... But no manual for the XT version =(
Praetorian said:The 97K one is the 2.7 Litre V6. There are three Tuscani models... 1.6, 2.2, 2.7.
All three are underpowered
No 2004 integra because, simply, it's nothing next to the old integra. The headlamps arent as good looking as before... plus it lacks the power.
Power without control is nothing
Just like speed (in terms of playing) without any musical sense is nothing
Praetorian
New member
Ah, yes, but then, one must also have to power to achieve greater things
