Word of advice: To those who did reasonably well for O levels, intend to go to a university and are able to enter a good JC, do go to JC. Poly's fun and carefree life is a mere farce and in your third year you'll be wondering why the heck did you think poly was a better choice than JC. This is exactly what is happening to me and a whole lot of other people I know.
True that. A lot of my friends also regret joining Poly because they didn't get that easier life that they were hoping to get.
JC and Poly is actually both tough, especially if you intend to further your studies in University much later.
JC is a faster route, and it also doesn't accumulate. That means you can screw up your normal exams in JC, but so long as you do well in your A levels, bingo. The rest of the bad exam results are magically written away. Plus, most university places give priority to the A level students
That said, the main negative point about JC is that its very stressful. If you do not do well in the A's, there goes two years of education. It is extremely difficult to salvage it, especially if you're thinking of studying in the local university. A lot of people I knew had to go overseas because they weren't able to get into local universities.
Poly is a longer route. But its a lot on projects, and once you finished studying your modules, you can safely put them away, only taking it out when it is necessary. Good for people who can't absorb everything and vomit everything out in one shot.
Poly also offers a more realistic approach into how the working world is like. In the working world, it is unrealistic to keep memorizing a lot of data and to vomit them out. Research, projects, etc. It offers a slice of how the working adult is like, except that the students are still relatively protected from bearing the full extent of the negative impacts
However, Poly is equally as stressful as compared to JC, except that the stress is more focused on rushing project after project, meeting tight dead-lines and ensuring that your project stands out among all the other projects.
Also, the GPA affects a lot of Poly people's results. Screw up a major topic, and the GPA takes a huge hit. Depending on how badly the damage is, it may or may not be recoverable.
Also, the problem of Poly comes when it goes to further university studies. The local universities do not offer a lot of places to polytechnic students. So its either you do brilliantly well and get a GPA of 3.5, or you go overseas
I'm writing this post in mind that one who wants to further their education wishes to do so in the local universities. NUS, NTU, SMU
Also, the curriculum offered by the JCs and the Polys are very different, and thus have very different needs.
A JC education requires a lot of critical thinking. It is challenging, demanding, yet rewarding. The people who do well in JC are those people who are able to do a lot of memorization work, yet know how to adapt EVERYTHING they have learn in the two years into the questions posed to them on that one exam. Not many people can do it, considering that the content in the A levels is many steps above O levels and the questions, very tricky.
Poly education are more suited for those who learn better hands-on. The polys offer an education that is a lot more hands-on learning. Projects, deadlines, etc. It is more suited for those who learn better in a challenging environment that closely mimics the real world. Furthermore, the Polys offer courses that would allow their students to understand how working in a particular job. They are specialized in their field and thus, at the end of the three years, would be able to go out into the working world and start to work in their specialized fields