I should get this off my chest. It doesn't feel good to be accused of being someone i'm not, especially not when that person has never met me.
I've been looking to buy a particular equipment for a year now. When a seller wanted to sell that particular equipment on soft forums, a fellow friend of mine contacted me and told me that someone is finally letting go.
i contacted the seller and quoted my price. he claims it's near brand new. i quoted him my best price, $400 subject to reduction upon inspection. My ideal price was $380, which i didn't tell him. i felt that was fair. apparently he didn't. he must have thought i would slash the price beyond what is reasonable in person.
he ultimately sold to someone else for $370. that was fine with me, there's always another one coming round someday.
but what i'm not happy about is his presumption of who i am over SMS. "I know what kind of buyer you are" sounds accusational of my integrity. Doesn't feel good, so here i am to make myself feel better. (In fact i DO feel better already).
So i thought i would open this up for discussion...
Price haggling is common practice, but whose loss is it when one party becomes too distrustful? I missed out on something i've been wanting for a long time, and the seller missed out on a higher price.
On one hand the seller is wary of buyers slashing prices, banking on the seller making a wasted trip if he doesn't let it go.
On the other hand buyers are wary of sellers overstating their claims of their item. I've had sellers claiming "brand-new" only to see the item chipped and with paint peeling and i made a wasted trip across the island to come home disappointed and empty-handed.
What could have been done to avoid this unnecessary loss at both ends?
I've been looking to buy a particular equipment for a year now. When a seller wanted to sell that particular equipment on soft forums, a fellow friend of mine contacted me and told me that someone is finally letting go.
i contacted the seller and quoted my price. he claims it's near brand new. i quoted him my best price, $400 subject to reduction upon inspection. My ideal price was $380, which i didn't tell him. i felt that was fair. apparently he didn't. he must have thought i would slash the price beyond what is reasonable in person.
he ultimately sold to someone else for $370. that was fine with me, there's always another one coming round someday.
but what i'm not happy about is his presumption of who i am over SMS. "I know what kind of buyer you are" sounds accusational of my integrity. Doesn't feel good, so here i am to make myself feel better. (In fact i DO feel better already).
So i thought i would open this up for discussion...
Price haggling is common practice, but whose loss is it when one party becomes too distrustful? I missed out on something i've been wanting for a long time, and the seller missed out on a higher price.
On one hand the seller is wary of buyers slashing prices, banking on the seller making a wasted trip if he doesn't let it go.
On the other hand buyers are wary of sellers overstating their claims of their item. I've had sellers claiming "brand-new" only to see the item chipped and with paint peeling and i made a wasted trip across the island to come home disappointed and empty-handed.
What could have been done to avoid this unnecessary loss at both ends?