I sell the guitar 1955 Gibson Les Paul standard Goldtop.

Markis1968

New member
This is an 'under the bed' example & could not be much cleaner. There is not even any finish checking on it. This guitar is pristine & unchanged in any way. There were 862 Les Pauls shipped in 1955. One would guess that approx. 1/2 of them had the wraparound tailpiece, making this a very rare guitar (esp. in this condition). According to records, there were only only 2300 goldtops w. wraparounds ever made (from '53 - '55). This guitar will be shipped promptly upon payment with full insurance. The buyer has 14 days to return the guitar. The guitar will be refunded. I ask for it beautiful guitar $3100. Please email me with any questions.
 
amazingly SOLD within minutes, haha ! man ... i really regretted that i went off from my computer for a pee when this ad was up.
 
funny, no contact number or email stated in his post right? and wouldnt the value of a '55 Goldtop, (pristine condition somemore) be valued around something like 55k USD or something? if not, this would be some news over at mylespaul and some of em vintage LP forums.
 
Hahaha.... Obviously its bs.... Nothing better to do....The owner must be old timer to buy this guitar....
 
eric, those great and amazing deals always come from zero post newbies...
i wonder why....

i have no idea too .. but now i'm wonderin who have just bought it


May I venture that people who are experienced and "educated" in the guitar marketplace, their choices and decisions are not rational in the same way as those who seldom interact with the market.

For e.g.

Person A does not know market values - he knows how much he enjoys his guitar, and how much he will enjoy the liquidity gained from selling his guitar, thus he sells his guitar for $X, which is what he thinks it's worth (rationally).

Person B has some knowledge of market values, and thus his valuation of his guitar's worth is not just how much utility he obtains from it, or how much utility he can gain from liquidating his guitar, but is also influenced by how much the market is willing to pay for it.


Now, this is pretty much common sense - so there's nothing really surprising. What is really intriguing is this:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...-studying-economics-hurt-ethical-inclinations

(which isn't the only extant study on how studying economics hurts ethics, and cooperative behaviour in game theory stuff, etc.)

So I propose also, that as Singaporeans get more economically literate and experienced, our decision-making matrices change as well, so that we are less ethical and less cooperative (in the game theory sense). Now - this idea IS disturbing, isn't it? And what we're seeing on the forum is also because Singaporeans (and people living in Singapore) are becoming more conscious of economic concepts, and figuring them into their decision-making.

It's a bad thing in my book (people feel less responsible for intangibles and not-so-tangible externalities that are hard to put a value on, e.g. freedom, privacy, pollution, crime, etc), and it promotes NIMBY behaviour. And though some say it might be good in the global market-place too (makes us more cut-throat), it might be bad too (because ultimately cooperation rewards people more than defection, in the long run c.f. Nowak's "Super Cooperators").

Just some of my lay-man ruminations percolating through to SOFT. (i.e. I'm no expert! So pardon the errors - but I'm open to learning if people wish to respond. :-] )
 

Latest posts

Back
Top