GN'R's more than a decade-long album out in November.

velvetrevolver

New member
Really, i dunno when we're gonna get it here in SG, but fans of GN'R, rejoice...
Though it's no more Izzy/Gilby, Steven/Matt, with Slash and Duff, there's still Axl, and when i do buy the CD, it's not gonna be cos of the songs. It's gonna be cos of the band name. And to a certain extend, cos of Axl. I mean, most of us who once adored GN'R can't deny that we once adored Axl as well, even though it's just a teeny-weeny bit. Well, he may be sick in the head and what not, but FINALLY, he's delivered the album.

Any inputs, guys?

http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news...chinese_democracy_track_listing_revealed.html
 
its about time also, release the album, its a closure of thigns and he can move on.

Heh, last album with the old line up, brand new release(91, 93 somewhere), i bought it as student, so many year later, i already uncle, they still dont want to release this one. Cheeezzzz! Piakersss!!
 
Ha over 10 years and 13 million in production costs, I think skeptical fans of the old GNR should give the new GNR a chance.

I am looking forward to it!
 
Honestly, the new album sucks.. I got some of the MP3's of the new songs, which was recorded live. The new songs are totally unlike the old GN'R. But hey, it's never GN'R without Slash, Duff and the gang, right? Axl alone doesn't make GN'R, in my opinion.
 
some bands are defined by certain individuals. like the smashing pumpkins for example, as long as billy corgan is in the band it doesnt matter who else forms their lineup; the essence is still there. other bands are like nine inch nails, rage against the machine/audioslave, creed/alter bridge.

obviously guns and roses isn't one of them. i'm sure axl rose has endeared himself to many, and has alot of flair. but perhaps his lack of SUBSTANCE took 10 years to be exposed
 
Back
Top