Gibson vs PRS

Whitestrat

New member
Well, here are the results... I can't believe Gibson would actually bother to do this...:rolleyes:

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0387p-06.pdf

I especially like this part:

"As Gibson concedes that PRS produces high-quality guitars, we do not believe such an occurrence could result in confusion harmful to Gibson. If a budding musician sees an individual he or she admires playing a PRS guitar, but believes it to be a Gibson guitar, the logical result would be that the budding musician would go out and purchase a Gibson guitar. Gibson is helped, rather than harmed, by any such confusion."


Gibson thinks that buyer confusion is detrimental to their sales. As if a potential buyer would confuse the differences between a PRS Single Cut and a LP. Hmm... I'm sure if it were me, I'd still buy a PRS. Heh...

I guess this is why PRS guitars continue to look stunning everytime since all the money they get from selling guitars goes back to building more stunning guitars. Gibson, on the other hand, chooses to use their money in other ways... Haiz...:mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
Their claim on how people mistake PRSes in shops for Gibson LPs....

PRSes are much prettier! haha, and its rather obvious IMHO..
 
im still a gibson fan too but the maple tops on PRS guitars are AAAAA+++. if gibson could match their tops on the standard models
 
i think either camp has their own sizeable group of supporters.its like fender and suhr, the strat stuff.but in this case prs and gibson over the les paul or sc guitars.one man's food can be another man's poison.
 
I can't believe Gibson would actually bother to do this...:rolleyes:

...Gibson, on the other hand, chooses to use their money in other ways... Haiz...:mrgreen:

Haha dude, I remembered years back, the old Gibson site used to have a section that explains why their guitar construction are superior over strats e.g fixed bridge gives more sustain etc. with diagrams/illustration. Obviously attacking Fender directly.
 
Back
Top