Gibson vs PRS

[mus]

Coke or Pepsi?

I'll drink pepsi please!

 

[jskadiang]

wait so the point of the argument was that some guy who wants to buy a gibson will walk into the store with 4000 dollars and see a prs and say "hey that looks like a les paul" and buy it?

 

[Whitestrat]

Haha dude, I remembered years back, the old Gibson site used to have a section that explains why their guitar construction are superior over strats e.g fixed bridge gives more sustain etc. with diagrams/illustration. Obviously attacking Fender directly.

Yep, that's exactly my point... They STILL do that...:mrgreen:

 

[Whitestrat]

wait so the point of the argument was that some guy who wants to buy a gibson will walk into the store with 4000 dollars and see a prs and say "hey that looks like a les paul" and buy it?

Yep... that's what Gibson was AFRAID of...

 

[naviros]

Hahahaha... IBANEZ FOR THE WIN~!!! Well, its hard to miss those Birds in Flight inlays, compared to boring block or trapezoid inlays... (besides you missing the words GIBSON, or PAUL REED SMITH right at the headstock before laying off a few grand...)

I think their competition should really focus on the REAL issues at hand (hint hint, you never know when people will suddenly like Pepsi more than Coke)

 

[Ized]

PRS's sound farking good but i still LOVE MY GIBSON ! haahha

So you'r saying PRS got more fark than bite compared to Gibsons? :lol:

 

[sklfc77]

All Gibson is doing is proving that they are worried over PRS' increased market share. After all, why would anyone mistake a high quality PRS for an overpriced staple of a guitar otherwise know as the LP? :mrgreen: I now await the knives