optisailor2002
New member
has it ever occured to you that i never denied that i am not beng as well =/
but got free food. who cares xD
but got free food. who cares xD
heh, its a closure for now!
to almondx,
whatever lah.
you got nothing better to do, google misc. info about me.
yeah, so what if i am God-fearing? does it matter if i believe in God/Buddha/Allah/Vishnu?
the fact is, no matter how much you think you know, or how right you think you are, you have proven to be a yaya-papaya self-righteous know-it-all arrogant snob.
what are you trying to be? the TGP Matte of SOFT?
nobody likes you here.
just graduated from JC? good.
go serve your national service and grow up lah.
closure?????????????
what? closure for what! no more free food? nooooOOOOoooo T.T
Also, you have given a couple of misleading advices on this forum which I failed to point out at that time:
"PICKUP TONES ARE INHERENT, REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU DO TO THE HEIGHTS. IT'S GOT TO DO WITH THE NUMBER OF WINDS AROUND THE COILS, OUTPUT VOLTAGE LEVELS AND DC RESISTANCE. THERE IS NO WAY TO GET A LOW OUTPUT TONE FROM A HOT WOUND PICKUP."
The emf generated by the coils of a humbucker is not constant. The magnetic flux is denser closer to the pickups than further. A current will be induced when the magnetic flux linkage is cut, given by X = nbacos theta where b is the magnetic flux density. The magnetic flux density is the number of flux lines, or lines of magnetic force, per unit area. Since the lines are denser closer to the pickup, at a constant rate of cutting the magnetic flux linkage a higher current is expected to be induced and hence a larger output. Increase the height between the pickups and the strings and a lower current is generated hence a lower output since the same region now contains fewer lines of magnetic force ie. the area which the strings lie on top of now contains has a weaker magnetic flux density.
Therefore, by lowering the height of the pickups, output (current) is lowered.
weee....
I"M FROM RJ AND I WAN ATTENTION WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What would you choose between Gibson LP standard and PRS standard satin 22 and why? They are in same price range. I prefer Gibson tone (absolutely huge with tube amps) but PRS has better playability. What are your thoughts?
Ok... honestly, there's nothing wrong with being ignorant. Hokkien got one saying: "Kiang Dio Ho. Mai Gei Kiang"...
While I do acknowledge that there's definately something we all can learn from everyone, I think there's something I do need to point out.
The one key reason I mentioned that it explains so much when you said you're 18, is that you seem to exhibit this unbending nerve to insist that what you know (regardless of source, cos I am giving you that benefit of the doubt) is the end all and be all of debates. I tried to be polite and ignore your flawed reasoning just so I won't expose how LITTLE you actually know what you're talking about:
Here, you make 2 mistakes:
1. You assumed you knew what I'm talking about completely. I apologise if I wasn't defining enough about my explanations in the previous topic. If you don't know, you should have asked. I would be more than happy to explain my claims.
2. I mentioned that a high output pickup will never produce a low output tone. (Ok, perhaps this statement is a bit vague). I didn't mention that a pickup's output cannot be affected by pickup distance from a string. For a very simple example. Lets use 2 single coils. One being a Kinman Traditional (low output), and one being a Kinman HX85 (high output). By your reasoning, simply keeping the HX-85 away at a far distance would produce a sound similar to the Traditional. Lets plot the output voltage of the Traditional at the minimum distance from the string without soundwave clipping. You will have one value. You will now find that no matter what you do with the HX-85, you will NEVER have enough clearance in the guitar body for your pickup deflection from the string to be able to produce an output voltage at the same level OR lower than the highest point for the Traditional. Theoretically it's plausible, but practically it's ludicrous. Because the DC resistances of the 2 pickups are completely different.
You claim my explanation is misguiding. Which is worse? Someone listens to me, and buys a low output set of pickups because he is led to think that's the only way to get such a tone? Or someone who listens to you and thinks he can get a low output tone from a high output pickup?
If you still don't believe me, please e-mail Mr Chris Kinman and ask him if it's possible. www.kinman.com
Picking a formula off some theory is easy. Rationalising it with practical EXPERIENCE is not. And this experience is EXACTLY what I'm talking about when I make a point about your age. You can raise a point for discussion. There's nothing wrong with that, and we all welcome it. But telling everyone what's right when it's only a half-truth based on assumptions is wrong.:???:
almondx, once again, whatever lah. nothing better to say, play the religion card somemore.
i am secure with my life, i have many friends here, i have no need to argue with an 18 yr old kid who thinks he knows it all.
say what you want, typing to you here is just a waste of time.
if you really want to talk, you come to my shop. i talk to you.
unit #01-06 Longhouse food centre, upp thomson road. put time put place.
Same, if you want to talk to me, feel free to pick a place to meet. Upp thomson road is way out of my way.
Religion card is not below the belt btw.
Not all RJC kids are elitist la... only almondx and a few others.
this is the whole IQ vs EQ thing all over again.