Money aside.
Consistency wise, i'd have to hand it to edwards. They seem to be able to produce their single cut guitars at a very consistent level. So far they have all been very playable and sound good. Also, they look really good.
Not so for gibson, i feel. Took me around 5 years to find one i liked alot recently (bought it in a jiffy). Gibson has some major issues with being consistent.
Recently i tried a brand new 70s style custom shop. I held it, took one look, thought it was third hand. Uneven finishing, shades of shiny parts and dull parts.
Binding was all over the place and you can even see them used different colours of binding at the sides. As if they ran out of the same material. Neck to body joint was very also done in a very messy fashion.
Guitar was not chambered but weighed ridiculous. I couldn't even hold in up for more then 2 mins. I reckon probably 8kg? I am sure its around there or heavier. Didn't even bother trying it. Just one of the many cases where gibsons ranging from 5-8k have absolutely not delivered in any department.
For the wide range of les paul models from gibsons, a great one can be in any of the series, the studios, the classics, the standards, customs, etc. But i would never buy a les paul blind without testing. Its like asking to be kicked in the nuts by an angry woman.
If i had to buy blind, i'd rather go with Edwards or PRS