litford
New member
I'm curious to know what some of you think an original Singaporean sound would sound like?
I'm curious because i was reading this thread about "What's wrong with the Singapore music scene" and one of the arguments was that plenty of bands are rip-offs, and the lament that Singapore in general has no culture on it's own.
I'm going to say that yes, influences abound, but it's not just a Singaporean condition, but a global phenomena. I think most bands out there 'copy', or are at least influenced by the past, or whatever scene they're playing in. it's natural.. if everyone was "original" in terms of sound, there would be no longevity to even having a sound. Everything would be dissonant. if there was one sound for one person, we'd never connect through music.
i think as bands, we borrow from our influences, some more than others. But what makes us original is the "spin" we put to our music. Finding the right pieces that fit, and ultimately what makes a song.
Timberland samples eurotrance and puts it into hip-hop / pop. It'd be seen as ripping off to purists, yet perhaps genius to someone who can appreciate the three different genres and fit them into one.
The Strokes sounding like the garage rock of The Rolling Stones? some might scream sacrilege, others might see more minute influences, or an update of an original sound and the simplicity of their songwriting..
So what is a totally original Singaporean sound?
- the accent?
- the riffs?
- the technicality?
- the arrangements?
I think they're all recyclable, but the heart and soul is what makes the sound, Singaporean.
here's a small explanation: for anyone who's written a song or recorded.. you're pouring your experience into the music. That's "Singaporean" written all over it. Not how it sounds to the listener's eyes.. but the integrity of the songwriter, the engineer recording, where it was recorded, how it was recorded, who your second hand guitar was owned by before. that's Singaporean, that's who we are.. and damn right i'm proud of Singapore's music.
I'm curious because i was reading this thread about "What's wrong with the Singapore music scene" and one of the arguments was that plenty of bands are rip-offs, and the lament that Singapore in general has no culture on it's own.
I'm going to say that yes, influences abound, but it's not just a Singaporean condition, but a global phenomena. I think most bands out there 'copy', or are at least influenced by the past, or whatever scene they're playing in. it's natural.. if everyone was "original" in terms of sound, there would be no longevity to even having a sound. Everything would be dissonant. if there was one sound for one person, we'd never connect through music.
i think as bands, we borrow from our influences, some more than others. But what makes us original is the "spin" we put to our music. Finding the right pieces that fit, and ultimately what makes a song.
Timberland samples eurotrance and puts it into hip-hop / pop. It'd be seen as ripping off to purists, yet perhaps genius to someone who can appreciate the three different genres and fit them into one.
The Strokes sounding like the garage rock of The Rolling Stones? some might scream sacrilege, others might see more minute influences, or an update of an original sound and the simplicity of their songwriting..
So what is a totally original Singaporean sound?
- the accent?
- the riffs?
- the technicality?
- the arrangements?
I think they're all recyclable, but the heart and soul is what makes the sound, Singaporean.
here's a small explanation: for anyone who's written a song or recorded.. you're pouring your experience into the music. That's "Singaporean" written all over it. Not how it sounds to the listener's eyes.. but the integrity of the songwriter, the engineer recording, where it was recorded, how it was recorded, who your second hand guitar was owned by before. that's Singaporean, that's who we are.. and damn right i'm proud of Singapore's music.