hmm..just now i met an australian man on the train, he began telling me about wat he thinks about this episode...he kept saying that there shouldnt be something such as a death sentence at all, "40 years in jail is punishment enough" because "i think human life is a sacred thing". He even went on to say that he didn't want the bali bombers executed! "killing them wont make the dead come back to life" and "by sparing their lives, we are sending them a message of peace, so those who were spared can influence other extremists to do things in a peaceful way". Well, i think he doesn't realise that religious extremists operate with a totally different mindset. Anyway, then i asked him, then wont it be unfair to spare nguyen when so many have died before him? He then said again that he thinks the death penalty is not the way to go, "Its happened before, in the US, they've executed wrong people before" and he thinks that Singapore might have wrongly executed a few too, out of the hundreds that have been executed. He also kept saying that singapore's newspapers are extremely one-sided, and "back home, we always get 2 sides to the story", which makes me wonder what we have been missing out on...hmmm...however, he mentioned that the australians are quite evenly split on whether to execute nguyen or not.