Mahogany neck vs Maple neck...

Kyokkai

New member
Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of mahogany and maple neck? Which is easier to warp and what tonal diffs does each wood have, etc, etc. I Searched the net and found some saying mahogany is stronger than maple and some say maple is stronger than mahogany. Which is which? Does anyone know which is harder and which is heavier? Pls help me out. Thnx in advance.
 
Last edited:
there really is no such thing called better sound. one man's meat another man's poison. what do u wanna hear? more warm tone? go for mahogany. more bright tone? go for maple. as for warping i've no idea. trust the truss rod u shall. and of course take care of ur guitar so the neck wont warp so fast.
 
there really is no such thing called better sound. one man's meat another man's poison. what do u wanna hear? more warm tone? go for mahogany. more bright tone? go for maple. as for warping i've no idea. trust the truss rod u shall. and of course take care of ur guitar so the neck wont warp so fast.

Alright. Thnx for all the info though its not really alot but i appreciate ur effort. I will rephrase the sounds better part to a more general one. Thnx :)
 
Not really a lot? He summarized just about everything you'll need to know about these 2 woods in a simple sentence. Go Google these things if you're really interested in finding out more.
 
there isn't anything averse pertaining to durability & tone issues of mahogany & maple. if there were any particularly acute problems with them, Gibson & Fender would have closed shop a long time ago...
 
Being a musician and a carpenter and an owner of a 73 fender jazz bass with a maple neck, I say there is no difference in sound. I have played an SG mahogany neck and the difference in sound was in the pick ups. Maple as a wood is more supple than Mahogany is. Mahogany is more brittle than Maple.
 
Being a musician and a carpenter and an owner of a 73 fender jazz bass with a maple neck, I say there is no difference in sound. I have played an SG mahogany neck and the difference in sound was in the pick ups. Maple as a wood is more supple than Mahogany is. Mahogany is more brittle than Maple.

I'm a lil intrigued by this, Doesn't the neck wood affect the tone of the guitar just as much or maybe not as much as the neck? The tonal frequencies of Maple is totally different from Mahogany, they're 2 opposites. But it's something to think about no?

And isn't Mahogany a more bassy wood, and maple a more trebly bright wood?
 
Last edited:
Not really a lot? He summarized just about everything you'll need to know about these 2 woods in a simple sentence. Go Google these things if you're really interested in finding out more.

Lols. I meant that it was a short one. Sorry anyways. :)
 
I'm a lil intrigued by this, Doesn't the neck wood affect the tone of the guitar just as much or maybe not as much as the neck? The tonal frequencies of Maple is totally different from Mahogany, they're 2 opposites. But it's something to think about no?

And isn't Mahogany a more bassy wood, and maple a more trebly bright wood?

That's wad i want to know too...0.o
 
Last edited:
Does it mean that mahogany is easier to crack when it warps if it's brittle? And that maple will not crack so easily when warping if it's supple? And can anyone tell me which wood is heavier? Thnx alot.
 
Last edited:
Do you know how to use Google?

I googled b4 i posted this thread. I used bing actually. There are some sites saying mahogany is more stable but there are other sites that say maple is more stable. Lots of contradicting results so i'm confused. Thought softies were more experienced dude. Sorry for pissing you off...
 
Last edited:
hehe, softies are not as experienced as those results that you cant find else where. Over here, while there are prolly some who has more insights to the instrument, there are also many others who read and learn from other online forums. Its the same everywhere infact. Over here prolly more clueless than elsewhere actually...
 
hehe, softies are not as experienced as those results that you cant find else where. Over here, while there are prolly some who has more insights to the instrument, there are also many others who read and learn from other online forums. Its the same everywhere infact. Over here prolly more clueless than elsewhere actually...

Oh....I see. Alright. I will take note of this in future. But anyway, I really appreciate all those who took the effort to help me out here. Thnx alot:)
 
Hey man, not sure if you've read this: http://www.guitarsite.com/guitar_FAQ.htm#FBOARD Not too sure about the credibility of this particular website, but it seems to voice what is general consensus in my thus-far-half-assed-guitar-education.

If you consider the density of the wood contributing to the stability of the wood then I guess I'd say Maple<Rosewood<Ebony

If you are REALLY interested in going deeper into the whole wood world, I think this is a good read, chapter 3: woods: http://books.google.com/books?id=CJ...ook_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBg

All in all I'll say that considering the crappy humid weather all wood no matter how good will crap out on u unless you make it a point to take good care of it, keep it dry (but not too dry), bring it back to alignment when it starts to warp (in the hands of a good luthier).

Okay write a lot already, basically at the end of the day the wood chosen serves a purpose to the tone you are after. All three choices of wood (maple, rose , ebony) are popular choices because of their proven stability as parts of an instrument and all require good maintenance habits on the musician's part.
 
anyway, the instrument that we are using aint going to break easily according to the wood. I have some geetars from the early 70s to late 70s, it it still holding up and still can wack hard to play. It aint going to break down because of the wood. The confusion over which one is harder, break easily, is also depending on how the person use the instrument, day in day out.

Even if its an instrument made out of metal and thrown around everyday, its going to break down one day as well, only matters is when.

As for the sound different, if to really look at the resonance of the string vibration in relative to the surface of the instrument, the most immediate surface that the strings vibrate across, is on the instrument surface, aka from the body top all the the way across the neck fretboard.

The mechanical vibration of the strings will be picked up by the pickup, convert into electrical energy and pass out to the output and to amp.

So where does the neck material comes into play in affecting the sound? Of course iam not doubting that theres differences, perhaps on the density of the wood. But without any proper quantitative measurement of such, what we can say here, is never an actual representation of the info that you are seeking.

Hehe, as for info elsewhere, sometime we have to take it with pinch of salt as well. The kinda wood which some are talking, are of different grade. When one encounter certain instrument with certain wood sucks, does it mean that across the many different brands of instrument, made with the same wood, suck as well or that its not a fair judgement since we dont even know the wood grade, the usage context etc.

Anyway, i do think that the notion of seeking info is always a good thing, but sometime, what we wanna know, is too general and thus unable to have a answer thats either "black or white". Theres also many other answers in forms of many colours.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top