lol thanks for the compliment Cheez
I'm actually coming to Singapore next week lol. But just to see about an apartment, and get drunk
This is crazy btw that people think they can teach piano when they reach grade 8 lol. Utterly ridiculous.
Not upping myself here, but I had my grade 8 when I was 11. does that mean I could have taught piano when I was 11? lol
That's a crazy attitude. When I was at music school, one of the audition pieces was a Chopin Scherzo. And that was just to get in - never mind actually getting a qualification!!
This is also a cultural thing, I think. In places such as Russia and Eastern Europe, being a teacher of piano is a highly respected and admired position to hold, and not a position you can get if you only have a silly little grade 8 certificate. If the 'grade 8 teacher' went to these places to try to teach, they would get laughed at.
Teaching diplomas are obviously good things to have, as they cover certain aspects of what is required from a teacher e.g. things to look out for - accuracy of rhythm, psychological aspects of the student actually understanding as opposed to 'copying', studies of anatomy, making the teacher aware of potential stress in the body (i.e. learning anatomy of the hand/arm etc etc, and studying things such as Alexander Technique, Dalcroze Eurhythmics, etc etc), how to inspire, how to positively criticise, repertoire familiarisation etc etc etc
Grade 8 doesn't even touch on these things. At all. At grade 8, all most people can do is play a few scales and a couple of pieces, and sight-read badly.
Sorry to any grade 8 folks reading this - but give yourself 10 or 15 years, and when you look back at the level you were at when at 'grade 8', you'll realise it was, at best, shoddy. If even as good as shoddy.
Cheez is correct in that a marrying of teaching and performing skills are necessary. Look at Yvgeny Kissin - his piano coach travels with him to every destination he visits, and helps him before every performance. And Kissin isn't exactly shabby when it comes to playing.
This is a tough issue, as experience also doesn't mean a better teacher. Many teachers become 'settled' in one method, and if a student doesn't learn 'their' way, then the teacher sees the student as incapable of learning piano. And that's not good. Someone who comes for lessons has the want to learn - simply by being there (that is, of course, if their parents aren't forcing them to be there lol) - so they should be encouraged in every way possible.
PS someone wrote in this thread that their teacher said 'i've seen worse' - that isn't encouragement. That's disgraceful, to be honest. A teacher should never compare students. The teacher should be saying something like 'you're far better than you were three months ago' - you should only ever be compared to yourself, if at all. If a teacher compares you to others, they are taking you down a dangerous path - one that can actually lead to deep psychological problems.
The problem seems to be that the focus is on music being a business. This is wrong from the onset, and will only last so long before it falls to pieces. Playing piano isn't about making money. It just happens that it
can make some money for some.
PS if I had a pupil who wanted to reach grade 8 purely so that they could 'teach', i'd chuck them out the front door lol
Simple question people should ask themselves - why, if they want to teach piano, do they want to teach it?