e-cigarette

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys, remember this thread is not to promote smoking as we all know that smoking is bad.

As this is a non medical proven method to kick the habit of real cigarette, we should be careful just in case it causes more harm than it seems.
 
i just realised i have an e cigar at home. someone gave it to my dad hahaha. it's the chinese version, called ruyan. hmmm gonna try it out soon
 
eh i went e-cig.com. really wanna get 1 man.

which ecig will u guys intro?? purpose is to cut cost of smoking la...... bth cig is so exp.

and how much for the kit + shipping? hope $50 will be enough.
 
i've asked the uncle at my shop.. he might bring in a couple of sets to test the market! haaha


coz his ciggs are the cheapest in the block, everyone buys from him... viceroy outside 10.20, he sells 9.80...

but yeah im promoting him e-cigs!!!
 
How do i post

hi, im new. sry. but how do i start postin my own tread.
i wanna start a topic on gettin an a cheap semi acoustic guitars.any reccomendations?
 
i've asked the uncle at my shop.. he might bring in a couple of sets to test the market! haaha


coz his ciggs are the cheapest in the block, everyone buys from him... viceroy outside 10.20, he sells 9.80...

but yeah im promoting him e-cigs!!!

but illegal to sell in singapore tau.
 
shinobi, if the e-cig is going to help reduce real cig, i think the government will give them out free to help smokers kick the habit cos they are the most caring government.

3480so2.jpg


I BEG to DIFFER!

and reading on, people smoking e-cigs got their products confiscated smoking in public where people can smoke...

I think the government are more concerned about imposing 500% tax on tobacco related products so they'd earn more $... ITS ALL ABOUT THE $ PEOPLE!
 
I BEG to DIFFER!

The article you posted is to hightlight that the company was trying to promote smoking through advertisement. Which is illegal.

Also, the company wanted to market it as a cigarette replacement and not as smoking cessation. That makes a lot of difference!
 
lol.

contradictory rites. if they want ppl to stop, they nid giving a alternative rite?

they won't allow these 'unconventional' methods, then normal methods cannot, then still say don't want ppls moking.

haiz all bullcrap. they want ppl to smoke but can't show it those money grubbers
 
The article you posted is to hightlight that the company was trying to promote smoking through advertisement. Which is illegal.

Also, the company wanted to market it as a cigarette replacement and not as smoking cessation. That makes a lot of difference!

yeah well, what u said is true... But confiscating e-cigs when smoking in public?? thats just outrageous.

the government wants to curb people from their smoking habits, fine good impose more tax, step up searches to find contraband smokers and handing them more fines... but the bottom line is, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

government bodies are earning tax and fines money... and our loving government brings in NEW BRANDS of ciggs.. MOSTLY LOCAL BRANDS... which the names aren't spose to be said here as later i kena file chap 11 of the tobacco and something someting act.

in malaysia, there's a doctor whois promoting this e-cig to his smoking patients and it helps his patients.... his proposing to the government to advertise this AS a smoking cessasition and aid smokers to eventually quit.

from my own standpoint, the government isn't tackling the problem of smoking, instead, they are pretty much adopting the get rich quick scheme. Smokers don't quit instantly after getting a huge fine, nor will they deter from smoking if the prices keeps on shooting up up up... So yeah, it's pretty much a useless way to get us people to quit....

maybe someone should take this up to a MP and propose this idea to the parliament!! :twisted:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top