OK - I understand now!
I haven't had the pleasure of playing any of the de Jonge classicals, much as I would like to. Besides, I think my playing won't do it much justice. Which is one reason why I'm deciding to build classicals at least right till the point I can notice the subtle differences between what I make and say, a Bernabe or a de Jonge. deJonge's guitarmaking course seems attractive, but at CAD$4000 (without room & board), I'd have to make many guitars and work many years to justify the cost.
I think lattice-braced guitars are pretty much the "in-thing" nowadays, very loud, piercing volume, at least from the Australian school of thought, championed by Smallman (and of course J. Williams). IMHO, Smallman's "toilet-seat" design is quite a radical departure from what used to be the norm - but from the little that I've heard, his bracing design pretty much adopts a trial-and-error approach in that if the carbon-reinforced balsa lattice, when attached to the *very* thin top doesn't sound *just* right, he'd have to discard the entire top. It's a hit-and-miss kind of design. Nevertheless, the guitar could always do with more revolutionary ideas as underlined by de Jonge and Smallman (as well as most Aussie luthiers like Simon Marty, Jeremy Locke, Z. Gnatek and Graham Caldersmith).
But to be sure, I guess I'm pretty much a traditionalist, at least for now I'm trying to fully understand the little nuances of the basic design that underlies the Torres/Hauser bracing pattern, whose fan bracing has more or less withstood the test of time for almost a hundred odd years. Of course, there have been variations, 3/5/7/9 fan bracing with different focal points, but the basic design is essentially still fan-shaped.
I'm M'sian, but have been in Singapore for eons now, half my family (mum's side) is Singaporean, so I think I'm on the way to becoming one.
I think of myself as local though - we're all brothers united by our love for the guitar.