To put it simply, as to why I've brought out all these points about the competition, is simply because the organisers had the cheek to actually copy my words, word for word, without even having any idea of what they're copying and just putting it together. I mean, when she replied that she wanted it to be the same across the board for all competition to be fair, very important question came to my mind: What about for Talentquest, Impresario, PowerJam, BOTB etc? Ethics come into question when she keeps trying defend and obviously show many loopholes that show that they are not exactly sure of what they are even doing.
I'm saying what I said only because it's a matter of defending what Singapore bands should have. If they become clear as to what they're doing I'll leave them as that, but it's very obvious that they are not answering my questions. At the end of the day it's your choice whether you want to go for it. I'm spotting many discrepancies in this competitions and sounding it out only because they plagiarised my words and did not reply with a good, satisfactory answer. No sense of knowledge of what they're doing and I sound it out out of concern and question about what they are doing. Note that I didn't say much before they copied and pasted my words.
Talk to the old-timers and they'll tell you what a joke many of the gigs which "require bands to sell tickets", and even to the young people it's ridiculous. What about a competition that you must do this as well? And until now they haven't answered me at all about who their judges are and their answers have nothing but blowing air to drag time. Does that make you wonder as to their credibility?
It is not arrogance, or whatever you might think. When you have organised a competition and actually tried calculating everything, then you'd realise what I've realised about competitions. Clarity is one of the biggest core issues that a competition should have. If not, the people who will be shortchanged are the competitors.
They have crossed the line, they haven't given a satisfactory answer at all, and with all due respect, stuntman's talk about musicality together with stage presence and appeal doesn't being "logical" isn't logical on its own. Please rephrase? Perhaps I'm missing out the point completely.
Just like what happened last time when a guy decided to sound out that some people are cheating others at the "For Sale" sections of Soft, he got flamed and he got people telling him to shut up, is that counted as complaining for sounding something wrong? In the service sector you're always required to give feedback to improve the service, so in this field it's important to shut up and go sit one corner while you see others getting conned? So that's counted as complaining?
If you are defending people who don't really care or are just gonna bite you back would you still go on? Even if you guys don't I will if people miss out very important points screaming in your face. I only intervened when they used my words which is a major disrespect and a showcase of their dubiousness. So sounding out what's wrong with the competition is arrogance and complaining?
And as for all the people who're telling me to relax. Yes I understand. Thank you for your concern. I hope you all can all see what's wrong with this competition, and I understand that you don't like arguments. And, yes I am concentrating on my competition, you don't see me constantly posting after every other message.
To gig_organiser: If you have an actual plan and ideas and what's going on in the competition please give everything you've got and show us what your competition is really about.