not only alternative guitars. amps, pedals, even other accessories.
I start with my take on les pauls. I used to exchange guitar with my friends on temp basis. Once i managed to get a Gibson Les Paul Black Beauty and doodle with it for 3 months. I was kinda excited to try out a real deal les paul. but i was kinda disapointed to find that the general construction and comestics can be matched by other jap lawsuit models i've tried like... hmm burnys, which is fraction of the price. I was also dissapointed when the i played the Black Beauty, the tone doesn't feels superior to the copies at all, with price difference in mind.
At first i tot it wouldn't be a fair conclusion since i'm playing thru a practice amp. but then again if amp is one important factor to tone (which i feel, actually plays a big part) then it does not justify why, to pay 3-5 times more for a Gibson, when for a fraction of the price, i can get a copy that plays well and is constructed well? and use the remaining cash to invest in a gd amp.
Ok, so at jamming studios, i got to play the Black Beauty thru another amp. i did an experiment, we rent the rm, with 2 similar amps, 2 randalls combos. I tweak both amps, same settings. The gibson into one and the other guitarist's burny into another. and we both, agree that, both, sounds close.
so, why buy a gibson when there are other equally well made alternative les pauls? this have puzzled me for a long time.
not saying the Black Beauty is no good. just that the price is too pricely... because of the brand??
Another story of what i'll call a 'gear snob'. Once, i was at swee lee. There's this couple, the husband is purchasing a Gibson Les Paul Standard. He's choosing a hard case for it. The wife actually said, 'Pick the most expensive one, it's a Gibson, it deserves the most expensive case!' what a.... #@^$#@^ best part is the husband plays like he's a beginner. i'm already a horrible guitarist, and he's worse. 8O