something like garageband
- Thread starter satch
- Start date
teraslasch
New member
cakewalk sonar
nuendo
nuendo
teraslasch
New member
t h e r e i s a l w a y s f r i e n d l y v e r s i o n s . . .
how about Screenblast ACID?It has decent amounts of drum and bass tracks(if thats what your looking for),and its not only drum and bass it has loads of instruments and their not really midi from what i used. i find it really easy to use too. Eg. panning, changing pitch with the tracks,etc. Really lovely software IMO
teraslasch
New member
well he asked for solutions and one of it was that 
.. ok bad idea.
btw, i think even if i became super famous or wad, i wouldnt mind ppl sharing my music. If it wasnt sharing in the first place, how would u get famous (my theory). anyway, in this world, friendliness is unavoidable, and its one of the ways many things are spread faster without the boundaries of wealth (another theory of mine) .. sry if i have offended anyone with my wierd logics :lol:
btw, regarding softwares, you should buy the unfriendly ones after using approachable versions.
again, i don think anyone here is friendly free, if u are, u must be a darnn rich kid.. u gotta admit, no one is absolutely friendly free.
.. ok bad idea. btw, i think even if i became super famous or wad, i wouldnt mind ppl sharing my music. If it wasnt sharing in the first place, how would u get famous (my theory). anyway, in this world, friendliness is unavoidable, and its one of the ways many things are spread faster without the boundaries of wealth (another theory of mine) .. sry if i have offended anyone with my wierd logics :lol:
btw, regarding softwares, you should buy the unfriendly ones after using approachable versions.
again, i don think anyone here is friendly free, if u are, u must be a darnn rich kid.. u gotta admit, no one is absolutely friendly free.
Cheez
Moderator
aiyah, tera, not again another discussion on piracy!!! We've been there before in SOFT! It didn't turn out good at all. Do know that there are people here who use only original stuffs, not because they are rich (many are NOT), but because of principles. I better not say more - just do a search!
As for sharing music, it's one thing to just "share your music". There's another way to "share" it the "friendly way": somebody takes a chunk of music off your own composition, change it a little, give it another name, and puts his name as the composer, then sell it as his own music. That's also "frendly" sharing. Or, somebody takes your music without even editing, and uses it wherever he likes, and uses his name as the composer. We composers are very wary of this kind of "sharing", and that's why we protect our own songs with copyright. Not that we want to earn royalties, but we want to protect what belongs to us. So I would think composers of all people should understand this concept and hold on to this principle.
As for sharing music, it's one thing to just "share your music". There's another way to "share" it the "friendly way": somebody takes a chunk of music off your own composition, change it a little, give it another name, and puts his name as the composer, then sell it as his own music. That's also "frendly" sharing. Or, somebody takes your music without even editing, and uses it wherever he likes, and uses his name as the composer. We composers are very wary of this kind of "sharing", and that's why we protect our own songs with copyright. Not that we want to earn royalties, but we want to protect what belongs to us. So I would think composers of all people should understand this concept and hold on to this principle.