recommendations for PRS

unathorized or otherwise, the bitter reality is- if you don't register your product, you don't have a case.

the only reason why Gibson had a case against PRS' singlecuts was because it's made legitimate by registration.

the major account for MIJ Fender unavailability in the states is the economics of imports pertaining to the MIM counterparts, of course.
 
Extract from the last paragraph from "Ibanez Counterfeit Warning" http://www.ibanez.co.jp/world/Counterfeit_Warning/index.html

"One final but very important note: Because of the damages and hardship that illegal merchandise cause at so many levels, counterfeiting is a serious crime. By regional statutes, in the most countries, it’s not only a felony to sell counterfeit merchandise, it’s a felony even to own it."

I know this is a statement from Ibanez, and not from PRS. However, the subject is not about the guitar manufacturer, but a subject on "counterfeit merchandise". So, is it okay to own a PRS copy? Knowing that it is not okay to own an Ibanez copy as stated above.

No offense to any guitar shops here that brings in PRS copies. This is just my personal question on this matter.
 
it's a simple issue really- Ibanez is warning the bandits who are producing non-Ibanez guitars & passing them off as Ibanez units. there's an 'Ibanez' decal there on the headstock, so the concern is valid.

POT, for instance, doesn't make singlecuts/ other look alikes & paste 'PRS' on them... of course, i'm not POT's legal representative in any way...
 
I see the point now. The illegal part is all about putting the guitar manufacturer's name on the copy.

Point established: copying original manufacturers' name (e.g. in the form of copying decals on the headstock) is illegal.

But, is it legal producing an exact copy? Without putting the original manufacters' name on the copy? Because I ever heard the mentioning of "Ibanez lawsuit Les Paul". Is it true that there really was a lawsuit? If it is legal, then why should Ibanez stop producing their own LP copies since they did not use the "Gibson" name.

Sorry to bring this so far...
 
when one duplicates another's design/ incarnation, the issue will then enter copyright territory, where registration is everything. refering to the Ibanez lawsuits- it's just that.
 
i guess we'll have to see the reaction of PRS on POT, if there's any at all.

sub, i think our discussions may get into a loop if we continue. :lol:

but, the good thing out of this is: grab a POT while we still can!
8)

IMO, the POT is good. Ever tried 2.
 
Thing is, Thailand is not party to any international convention on trademarks + low penalties/fines for infringement of trademarks registered outside of Thailand. So your POT dream guitars with the US registered birds and headstocks are safe for now.

So sticking to my original story, they may not be able to stop production but can stop imports into the US where it will violate their US trademarks. Not that any of these guitar companies would notice these guitars taking a small chunk out of their sales in SEAsia.
 
OMG I just noticed the birds have been replaced by butterflies on their website. Modified headstocks too. Heheh, received some sound legal advice I'll bet.

Butterflies inlays are a nice touch. They look more appealing now that they don't look like direct knock-offs.
 
babelfish said:
Those guys use Ibanez and a PRS singlecut I think. In that case you can go have a look at the many good affordable singlecut guitars a lot of people have mentioned. Always start with a sensible budget and look for something you like in that price range. For $2k you can get pretty good set neck mahogany guitar. MIJ LP copies, Ibanez SZ Prestiges and Schecters to name a few. Many choices, especially since you probably haven't yet developed a sense of the kind of config you like and what doesn't float your boat. :wink:

Generally singlecut guitars cover a bigger frequency spectrum, especially the bass response. Doublecuts of similar wood construction would have a more focused less broad tonal range.

That's why I wanted to know what your idea of a nice "clean" tone is. Everything is "clean" if you don't run it into distortion. Difference lies in "warm and full" clean or "sparkly and spanky" clean.

Don't be too concerned about the specs. The best way of telling if a guitar's right for you is to pick it up and play. If it inspires you to play, it's a keeper.

Another piece of advice: spend up to the point where you can tell the difference in what you're paying extra for. It's like my audiophile friends who spend more money on their hifi because they can hear nuances in the recording that I can't.

You made a very good point Babel.

It is good to look for guitars based on what kind of tones you wanna achieve, and if you have already established what 'brand' you are going for (say PRS in this instance), consider what it offers you that others (which can match up: in terms of price for eg.) can't.

Anyone wanna talk about that korean PRS? haha..
 
cookie said:
Hi all,

Im looking for my 2nd guitar and i need help in choosing a PRS

Any recommendations? a good clean tone would be perfect... pls state the price also :D

hi cookie, you might like to snoop around on the birds&moons forum
http://forums.birdsandmoons.com/forum/index.php
its a forum dedicated to the discussion of PRS guitars. lots of info there on PRS. maybe you'll be able to decide which model suits you best.

i kind of like PRS guitars :D
DSCN3439.jpg

DSCN3441.jpg
 
personally, i think the POT is just ok and definately no substitution for a PRS. and yes, if you look closely, there are quite some flaws.

check out luther classifieds, there are quite a few person selling theirs already... well... maybe you can say that it's just a coincident that this period of time POT owners are short in cash... :)
 
sqoobs said:
i guess we'll have to see the reaction of PRS on POT, if there's any at all.

sub, i think our discussions may get into a loop if we continue. :lol:

nah... if we keep things in check it won't. 8)

i've nothing but respect for POT. a definite future acquisition.
 
fenderfan said:
personally, i think the POT is just ok and definately no substitution for a PRS. and yes, if you look closely, there are quite some flaws.

i'm of the opinion that no particular guitar can comprehensively replace another.
 
Sub,

If you're going for the POT, how would you want to customize it? I heard from G77 that POT is able to customize it to every specs provided by their customers. Cool right? Just wanna hear your expert opinion, if you were to order a customised POT. Squeeze all the great attributes of your 17 babes into one? 8)

Neuro,

thanks for the http://www.guitarandpickup.com link. Looks like they posted more pictures of their products. The "Dolphin Model" is fantastic. 8O
 
sqoobs said:
Sub,

If you're going for the POT, how would you want to customize it? I heard from G77 that POT is able to customize it to every specs provided by their customers. Cool right? Just wanna hear your expert opinion, if you were to order a customised POT. Squeeze all the great attributes of your 17 babes into one? 8)

replicating everything i own & compressing it into a single unit is the last thing i'd do... i'd choose a singlecut design with a solid-finished top & a single humbucker, one volume knob- that's it. minimalist approach... in any case, it's been done before 8)
 
cookie said:
would you all recommend an SE? hows the tone and sound compared to the original

i'd recommend the SE models anytime. these should never be compared to the original but they are good guitars per se.
 
Back
Top