jumbofret said:
thor666: The number of frets do not affect pinch harmonics, the neck scale does. The number of frets affect the placement of the neck pup, and hence, the sound captured and produced.
heh yea i got that...

but that's not the point i'm trying to make...
what i'm trying to say is this: the richness in harmonics does not necessarily contribute to a better tone. if this were the case, everybody would be dumping Fender strats...
i would compare this discussion with say, having a distortion pedal in your set up. Simply having a distortion pedal on one's set up doesn't guarantee that you'll get a better tone. in fact they're two different things.
on the other hand, improving sustain is usually a tonal improvement. changing the timbre could -possibly- improve or degrade the tone.
also, i just read the article. it's NOT quoted with references and it IS selective about what it says. for instance, he doesn't quote Fenders as an example. also, the last i checked, the imaginary 24th fret on my fender contemporary is slightly Before the neck pickup.
applying his factoids with my own experience:
Factoid 1; A typical Fender does not sound muddy when you play chords !!!!!
Factoid 2,3,4,5; N.A.
Factoid 6; He explains that his Quicksilver is better than newer PRS in this respect.
Perhaps clearly you have just highlighted the point: it's not the frets that matter but the pickups. And for that reason his argumentation is really very poor; other than to criticise PRS 22 frets and to promote his Quicksilver guitars, not all that he says is clear. that almondx would raise the question would seem that his article, while possibly having some elements of truth, is also quite misleading.