anti-ozzy PRO-DIO

Forsale

New member
Hey peeps... join the club. Personally i feel ozzy can't sing for nuts. Dio kicks ass anytime anywhr. May the music live on.


+1
 
bro...you can't use the comparison of apple and pears with OBAMA and BUSH man.

Ozzy is totally overrated. he can't sing for shit. thinks he's some puffed up high and mighty "prince" of darkness my ass.

DIO is one hell of a vocalist. Tamed like a lion mighty like a dragon. and he's got style.

Thumbs up to that.
 
DIO is one hell of a vocalist. Tamed like a lion mighty like a dragon. and he's got style.


... tamed like a lion? *confused*

Anyway, I actually like both Ozzy's vocals and Dio's vocals. Different styles, different presence, different character. Whatever the case is, they both fronted Black Sabbath, which is more than what most of us can even dream about.

There are people who like Bush. And already people starting to think Obama's overrated. Whatever the case is, they both ruled USA, which is more than what most of us can even dream about.

;)
 
LOL there are many different types of singers and and guitar players and music etc. but theres only one presidential position. The only reason why people even compare ozzy and dio is because they fronted the same band, and each vocalist created a new sabbath era. had they both become famous in their own way, there would have never even been a thought of comparing them. Ozzy is old he is 61 and his vocal range is getting smaller by age. Dio is a professional singer who used to sing opera i was told, and he has golden pipes that allow him to sing so well at his age. You cant blame ozzy and tell him he sucks for not being blessed with ageless pipes like dio.

Tom araya from slayer can't even do the angel of death scream anymore
Led Zeppelins reunion a few years back needed to change the keys of their songs because of robert plants vocal range

it really is like iommi and malmsteen.
malmsteen is superior and can outshred iommi, but to even compare them is stupid. They ARE apples and pears.
 
haha i agree with you bro dio always will be number 1 ,just my personal preference though every time he sings i will get goosebumps.To me dio is the father of metal :)
 
haha i agree with you bro dio always will be number 1 ,just my personal preference though every time he sings i will get goosebumps.To me dio is the father of metal :)

The father of metal is Tony Iommi, and he's not even a singer
 
this guy cant sing for whatever reason la
ozzy is this and that la
is not just about the voice or talent..
its about respect and the pioneers of it
remember halford of judas priest?
he have nice vocals and can reach the high notes..
and his gay.
People do respect him as the pioneers of early metal
so what concearn now is that....ozzy,dio,halford all those high pitch mofos are mostly pioneers of metal
if u dont like ozzy voice..then stop listening to him

why would u care anyways?
and yeah

merry christmas:)
 
Wassup man with anti this and that, pro this and that. This is music. Universal. Period.
U don't like certain bands, singers, etc.. it's ok.. but dun have to anti them.
 
Personally, I've always dug Ozzy's vocals more as opposed to Dio's. Sure in terms of proficiency and pitch, Dio would win by a longshot.

But to me, in my honest opinion, I thought that Ozzy had more spunk.

And he WAS the first singer that established the genre that we all know and love...
 
1) you don't have to "anti" a particular singer.

bro...you can't use the comparison of apple and pears with OBAMA and BUSH man.

2) actually, yes YOU CAN compare apples and oranges. That's when you're choosing within the category of "fruit". When we're choosing within the general category of "singers", yes you CAN compare ozzy and dio, or even compare Jay Chou and Tom Araya.

It's all a matter of psychology.

That being said, choosing within general categories should only be done at the right times and places. Like choosing which song to listen to from your whole music library as there are 101 genres of music in there.

If one constantly only compares candidates using the most general of categories, the tendency to look like a total Douche like the TS now will be high.

3) I do find myself having to make choices between spending my time listening to Cradle of Filth or The Bee Gees. But you see? I'm doing that comparison because it is the appropriate situation, time and place.
 
Big Sabbath fan here. Well, Ozzy = more fun to listen to. Dio = more amazing to listen to. That's the low down. Ozzy's singing is catchier than Dio's, but Dio's range and control is far superior than Ozzy. All in all, I think both of them did well in Black Sabbath.
 
The TS is obviously way biased towards Dio. And he's not even open for argument so I don't see a point in this thread.

Anway, my respect to both vocalists, they're mammoths in their own respect.

Cheers
 
wats wrong with Ozzy?

and wats up with the hate and the anti2 thinghy? too free ah?

both are great vocalist n i personal like Ozzy more than any vocalist in this world. look at him, his a great entertainer!
 
I feel stupid to even comment on this thread. But how can anyone not like Ozzy period Sabbath? Sure Ozzy wasn't the best vocalist but he made the band what it was.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top