pepper- said:
Okay this is the first time, I see a large number of people saying Katie Leung is hawt. Haha. Cuz so far, everyone I met has been unhappy that ChoChang turned out that way.
Well I think she did okay. To me, she just didn't exactly fit the real description of the ChoChang in the book. But she was okay. (;
sycododo, yeah those fan sites. Geez. I think many years later, the Harry Potter series could be used in schools for Literature Studies. Haha!
defintely not.
harry potter isnt what you call literature. pop culture maybe. literature not. not as an accepted field of academia.
1) J K rowling targets her books at tweens/teenagers. look at the principal characters and you'ld know what i mean. it makes the book avaliable to a broad spectrum of readers, as they identify the characters with themselves and defamiliarise themselves (your average joe,same people , different world)
2) the way the characters are developed. pretty much standard fare throughout any fantasy novels. in fact, i think the casting of harry potter / the chosen one / the price vs. the dark lord/ the evil supreme penultimate , pretty much runs the common thread among ALL fantasy novels, requiring a supreme protanganist versus a supreme penultimate evil.
in fact , i feel the casting of harry potter as a tween - teenage wizard is deliberate to exploit the market again
3) theres nothing ground breaking about rowling's work. nothing technically special or unique. perhaps it would be fair to say that warm style she writes it, creates and develops the characters well enough for the readers/audiences to engage with the characters as it is reminiscent of their own lives at some point or another, yet altogether fresh and new as it is in a different setting(read: a magical world).perhaps it is the way Rowling allows us as readers to emphatise and feel for the characters through developing and focus on their nature, their struggles rather than the struggles of the world around them. character driven, but then again , nothing new.
maybe academia of pop culture/ literature ?
harry potter is escapisim, dosent serve to really bring about an issue or theme that makes you think. thats what literature is fundamentally all about. the presentation of the writer's perspective in an alternate manner for our common understanding and to urge us to consider it from that perspective.