IT IS often said that the measure of an artist isn't so much how many people like your work, but how much they'd pay for your work. Would a Picasso still be "a Picasso" if his paintings only cost 10 bucks?
By that argument, we can assume that the worth of a musician can be ascertained by how much someone would fork out to watch said muso sing a bunch of songs. And that wouldn't say very much at all about our local bands.
MONEY TALKS
See, fans fork out over $100 for tickets to see their favourite international acts, but how many are willing to whip out their wallets for local musicians like Jack and Rai, The Fire Fight, Allura or Electrico?
It's this mindset that has been bugging local musicians for years, and is one of the factors industry players say is hindering the growth of the English local music scene.
Right now, most performances by local bands are free. The Esplanade, a strong supporter of local music, organises free performances every day, whether it's at the Concourse or at their Outdoor Theatre. They do have ticketed performances, such as the Late Nite Series, but those are in the minority.
Club performances are technically free gigs, too - patrons pay for the one-drink minimum or entry fee, not for the performance itself.
So, would anyone here pay just to see the band and nothing but the band?
We did an online straw poll about whether fans would pay to watch local acts and drew the following responses:
According to theliverevoluation: "I don't mind paying up to $30 if there are new bands playing - if they are good. No need to add in drinks or whatsoever."
Wrote glentiaw: "I've been at some pretty crappy gigs which were worth not even a fraction of the entry fee. As long as the gig is good, local or not, I don't see an issue."
Said Syam41: "I'd love to go to more local gigs and concerts, but as a student, there are limitations. So most of the time, price plays a part. The most I have paid is $25 for a local gig, and that's only because I'm a huge fan of Great Spy Experiment."
And our favourite comment, from shinobi: "To me it's not merely the band but the entire gig as a whole. Like if it was damn happening with free booze and chicks getting crazy, then $50 also can."
SHOW ME THE MONEY
A majority of respondents echoed the above sentiments, which begs the question: If people are willing to pay, then why aren't musicians willing to charge? After all, it's a job. Don't they want the moolah?
One reason, said music enthusiast T K Pang, is that our Asian upbringing makes musicians feel "bad" for charging.
"They would rather let other people set the price than come up with it themselves," he said. "And even if they do set the ticket prices, it's usually fairly low."
Another reason could be that the reality of their popularity might hit too close to home. What if they started selling tickets and nobody turned up?
It's scary but necessary, said concert organiser Michael Hosking, the head honcho of Midas Promotions.
"You can't tell how many people actually like you at a free gig. They're there because it's free.
"You don't have to charge a lot of money, but the point is that you want the public to pay for the performance. If you're playing in a club, people should pay above the normal entry charge for drinks that they'll have to pay for anyway. After all, that's what they're doing for concerts by major international stars."
Setting prices isn't quite arbitrary as some might think. "It really depends on a few variables," said Esmond Wee, label manager for Wake Me Up Music.
According to him, factors determining the ticket price include where the venue is, what the costs are, who the acts are, and what the occasion is. For example, if it's an album launch, the ticket price usually includes a copy of the CD.
"For the more established acts, we do price tickets higher sometimes ... because there is a certain value there," he added. "Why do we put a price tag on the acts? It's personal branding and adds value to the band. It helps the band earn something for all the hard work they've put in their careers."
The bottom line: Local musicians need to make a living, which means they need money, which they get when they perform. So, if you work backwards, that means: No money, no musicians.
But what's important is that there are people going to these gigs - and that's always a good thing. And maybe, just maybe, the bands here can start telling tickets a la Stefanie Sun or J J Lin.
It may be a dream right now, but as someone once pointed out, if you don't dream, how will your dreams come true?
Taken from http://www.todayonline.com/Plus/Music/EDC091029-0000031/?Economics-of-scales
Just to share
By that argument, we can assume that the worth of a musician can be ascertained by how much someone would fork out to watch said muso sing a bunch of songs. And that wouldn't say very much at all about our local bands.
MONEY TALKS
See, fans fork out over $100 for tickets to see their favourite international acts, but how many are willing to whip out their wallets for local musicians like Jack and Rai, The Fire Fight, Allura or Electrico?
It's this mindset that has been bugging local musicians for years, and is one of the factors industry players say is hindering the growth of the English local music scene.
Right now, most performances by local bands are free. The Esplanade, a strong supporter of local music, organises free performances every day, whether it's at the Concourse or at their Outdoor Theatre. They do have ticketed performances, such as the Late Nite Series, but those are in the minority.
Club performances are technically free gigs, too - patrons pay for the one-drink minimum or entry fee, not for the performance itself.
So, would anyone here pay just to see the band and nothing but the band?
We did an online straw poll about whether fans would pay to watch local acts and drew the following responses:
According to theliverevoluation: "I don't mind paying up to $30 if there are new bands playing - if they are good. No need to add in drinks or whatsoever."
Wrote glentiaw: "I've been at some pretty crappy gigs which were worth not even a fraction of the entry fee. As long as the gig is good, local or not, I don't see an issue."
Said Syam41: "I'd love to go to more local gigs and concerts, but as a student, there are limitations. So most of the time, price plays a part. The most I have paid is $25 for a local gig, and that's only because I'm a huge fan of Great Spy Experiment."
And our favourite comment, from shinobi: "To me it's not merely the band but the entire gig as a whole. Like if it was damn happening with free booze and chicks getting crazy, then $50 also can."
SHOW ME THE MONEY
A majority of respondents echoed the above sentiments, which begs the question: If people are willing to pay, then why aren't musicians willing to charge? After all, it's a job. Don't they want the moolah?
One reason, said music enthusiast T K Pang, is that our Asian upbringing makes musicians feel "bad" for charging.
"They would rather let other people set the price than come up with it themselves," he said. "And even if they do set the ticket prices, it's usually fairly low."
Another reason could be that the reality of their popularity might hit too close to home. What if they started selling tickets and nobody turned up?
It's scary but necessary, said concert organiser Michael Hosking, the head honcho of Midas Promotions.
"You can't tell how many people actually like you at a free gig. They're there because it's free.
"You don't have to charge a lot of money, but the point is that you want the public to pay for the performance. If you're playing in a club, people should pay above the normal entry charge for drinks that they'll have to pay for anyway. After all, that's what they're doing for concerts by major international stars."
Setting prices isn't quite arbitrary as some might think. "It really depends on a few variables," said Esmond Wee, label manager for Wake Me Up Music.
According to him, factors determining the ticket price include where the venue is, what the costs are, who the acts are, and what the occasion is. For example, if it's an album launch, the ticket price usually includes a copy of the CD.
"For the more established acts, we do price tickets higher sometimes ... because there is a certain value there," he added. "Why do we put a price tag on the acts? It's personal branding and adds value to the band. It helps the band earn something for all the hard work they've put in their careers."
The bottom line: Local musicians need to make a living, which means they need money, which they get when they perform. So, if you work backwards, that means: No money, no musicians.
But what's important is that there are people going to these gigs - and that's always a good thing. And maybe, just maybe, the bands here can start telling tickets a la Stefanie Sun or J J Lin.
It may be a dream right now, but as someone once pointed out, if you don't dream, how will your dreams come true?
Taken from http://www.todayonline.com/Plus/Music/EDC091029-0000031/?Economics-of-scales
Just to share