SG or warlock

[kahuna]

As my title says...should i keep my epiphone SG or sell to my fren and get a BC rich warlock mick thompsons signature?opinion pls appreciated

 

[rottenramone]

..

personally?




SG :twisted:

 

[crozzfire]

although i love the SG..but i would prefer a warlock more 8)

 

[Nefianz]

heh i own the mick thompson warlock before and i'm using a epiphone SG now.. the warlock is godamn heavy man..

i prefer the SG though.. sounds better and much lighter.. i had to buy big bass kinda strap and still my shoulder hurt..

the head stock is wicked sick though.. :twisted:

 

[Phil]

If possible, keep both.

I love both, but I'd take the SG. More versatile, imho.

 

[deathblaze]

SG! but a warlock would rock too haha

 

[crozzfire]

haha depends on what kind of music u wanna play la..if the SG is not heavy enough for u taste..get the warlock..sound damn heavy!!and somemore the looks alone can kill :twisted:

 

[Guest]

for me..if im given a choice..i'll keep the SG..

cos..the SG looks demure..at the same time..WICKED..

 

[kank_39]

heh i own the mick thompson warlock before and i'm using a epiphone SG now.. the warlock is godamn heavy man..

Hey man.. Remember me? :wink: :lol: Maybe Not but YOU SOLD YOUR WARLOCK?! WHY?! Wasted lah.. That's really one wicked axe.

Oh yah.. BTW I personally would go for a SG but if given a choice, i would keep both. The SG to keep in standard tuning and the Warlock for down tuning.

 

[crozzfire]

alamak ya la why u wanna sell warlock?its such a sexy guitar given its looks and tone..

 

[Phil]

I don't think the BCrich Warlock's of the best construction though. But I can't deny that it looks horribly good!

 

[Lifehouse]

Two different axe cater for two kind of needs. Ultimately ask yourself what do you think will suit you better?

 

[crozzfire]

haha yes..but i would think that a beast looks more stylo man..haha

 

[suspend_thought]

the beast is damn uncomfortable la. When you sit down, it bloody clamps down on your leg/groin, and the ends are too sharp -> fragile.

the only thing outstanding about the BC rich guitars are the shapes..

 

[Lifehouse]

You don't look good if you don't sound good.

 

[neuro182]

SG wld be a much better option. Warlock shape is unconventional & heavy.

You may look cool with it, but I reckon u wld be comfortable carrying it & playing for long hours.

May I know what is the reason for switching frm SG to a Warlock? Is it cosmetic reason or tonal reason?

 

[Brendan]

haha , i dont like MetalGenre-like guitars
for me i prefer SG to Warlock

for wild shaped guitar , i think a white Flying-V is much nicer than a Warlock
i dont like any part of Warlock : /

sorry if i offended some people .

yes , like Lifehouse said , sound and tone are more essential .

 

[CyanideJunkie]

SG wld be a much better option. Warlock shape is unconventional & heavy.

You may look cool with it, but I reckon u wld be comfortable carrying it & playing for long hours.

he's right. i own a bc rich beast, and everytime i carry it i feel like jesus at cavalry :lol:

 

[NewGuy]

SG for me too... just look nice without too much of the cosmetic... and 2 killer horns with a comfy shape... tone wise is more versatile I guess... anyway it has to be SG for me...

 

[suspend_thought]

he's right. i own a bc rich beast, and everytime i carry it i feel like jesus at cavalry :lol:

When you carry it it's heavy, when you play it sitting down it hurts like hell because of this part circled in red:

Lucky the warlock doesn't have that.