Roland Or Cedric

cedric!
when you multi track/record live,layer tons of guitars/vocals or what knots,live 'feel' is a very important aspect/tool in recording.
if you know what i mean.
drums should not be triggered.
if you hear ava's album,the mix and balance is very well done.
nothing falls out of place.
nothing sounds too compressed,digitalized,triggered.
the live 'feel' is there and the mix compliments it very well.
and i saw cedric's gear once at the web.
you have the chance to use pre amps,power amps and lots more!
eye candy!!
you dont wanna 'cheat code' when recording an album/ep.
it defeats the purpose of entering a recording studio.
recordings should be done the way it should be.
the classic way.
just my point of view.

whereas in the other part of the world....
most american bands such as foo fighters,incubus,glassjaw prefer recording live,as in the whole band comes in at one shot and record.
then they layering parts come in.
and then the mix and stuff.
and take note,most of these bands does not use a click track' (automated metronome) , as they believes "it takes away from the true essence of the music"
well and of course they can afford to do this.
they're full time musicians and tight as hell!
 
cedric!

whereas in the other part of the world....
most american bands such as foo fighters,incubus,glassjaw prefer recording live,as in the whole band comes in at one shot and record.
then they layering parts come in.
and then the mix and stuff.
and take note,most of these bands does not use a click track' (automated metronome) , as they believes "it takes away from the true essence of the music"
well and of course they can afford to do this.
they're full time musicians and tight as hell!

dude do you know what youre talking about? the modern trend is a very loud, heavily compressed and in your face type of sound.

anyway i say go for roland. pretty good mix there
 
roland and cedric are both great engineers, testimony being their work. but i personally prefer cedric's sound. maybe its the band, but i feel like there's more colour to it?

and i heard cedric does not charge by a per hour basis. would anyone care to clarify?
 
hello

quote from ahmadk
'drums should not be triggered.'
'you dont wanna 'cheat code' when recording an album/ep.'

i really beg to differ
im sure that most of the drum recordings are triggered in someway or another.
it makes your mix more pleasant to hear rather having different intensity of each kick/snare all over the place.

about the cheat code thingy, it doesnt really beat the purpose of entering a studio, depends how you look at it in the first place.
cheat codes / 'studio magic' where you can do vocal harmony and melody, double track guitars, do solo harmonies even do auto tune/melodyne on your vocals if you vocalist cant hold his note for nuts. if we were given a chance, would we want to do all this?
without a doubt yes!

in my personal opinion bands should utilize and take advantage as much
cheat codes / 'studio magic' there is and this is where your audio engineer creativity comes at play.

then again, all of this is subjective.
im not forcing my opinions on anyone.
all of the above is thru my own personal experience.

without any doubt my vote goes to roland lim.
he has come a long way to reach where he is now.
and by saying that im sure in his line of work he cant keep everyone happy.

if anyone has any clarifications on roland lim's and the quality or service he got to offer
im sure mister pedalitis can explain further.
 
roland and cedric are both great engineers, testimony being their work. but i personally prefer cedric's sound. maybe its the band, but i feel like there's more colour to it?

and i heard cedric does not charge by a per hour basis. would anyone care to clarify?

He charge by per project. For example, one song he charge a flat rate of $XXX , including mixing and Mastering. Unlimited time of recording of guitar , bass , vocals.

He might be moving to Sound Advice, maybe his charging rate might change.

cheers
 
Cedric.

Hey guys,

I'm Matt of AVA and this is my first post in Soft. Only chose to create an account because this topic of Cedric vs Roland is really interesting! Heh.

I am about to tell what is true and cool about Cedric, the dude that recorded AVA's debut album. Whatever i say about him, i'm not saying that Roland can't do the same or better, simply because I have not worked with Roland before. I hate comparing anyway!

So here goes. Cedric is committed, creative, funny, and most importantly, he's pretty anal during recording. He will make sure the band dish out their best takes. No compromise. Also, he is very knowledgeable as well. He knows his shit. Especially heavy shit. That's one of the main reasons why we picked him. He knows the kinda feel and vibe that we were trying to achieve. He constantly sat down with us and discuss on how we could experiment with different gear and recording methods to better bring out our songs.

Being a frontman himself, Cedric really helped me out a number ways. As this album is my first time bursting balls, screaming a hell lot, he constantly gave me advice on how to get my screams out right.

He didn't just recorded us, he produced the album with us. I cannot imagine how the AVA album will sound like without his input. Quite a number of ideas were actually his. Top of my head, his input in "We Are Not The Same", the choruses and the bridge as well, really made a lot of difference. He knows how to better engage the listener and how to bring songs to another level.

Other cool things about him include:

- His studio is at Serangoon, near Serangon Gardens. Nothing better than good food after or before your recording session!
- He has 18 Cats. I am a Cat lover so.. yeah.
- Free of soft drinks in his fridge.
- Sometimes alcohol included.

Well, i can on and on but no. Heh. No matter who you pick, good luck in producing your EP/album! Cheers!



Matt.
 
Hey guys,

Other cool things about him include:

- His studio is at Serangoon, near Serangon Gardens. Nothing better than good food after or before your recording session!
- He has 18 Cats. I am a Cat lover so.. yeah.
- Free of soft drinks in his fridge.


Wah confirm nearby chomp chomp and FREE DRINKS toooooo.... cant wait to go to his place to record...hahahahahh
 
crazy long post

Top of my head, his input in "We Are Not The Same", the choruses and the bridge as well, really made a lot of difference. He knows how to better engage the listener and how to bring songs to another level.

How were the harmonies? I helped him out there lol :P

I think Matt gave nearly about everything you'd generally go through with Ced.. I haven't recorded with Roland (or maybe I did? I can't remember lol) but I've recorded with Ced for years and I'll share a slightly more detailed insight on the experiences.


On a general musician's perspective:

- He's a crazy perfectionist, and in my books that the best you could get during the recording process (especially when you're not paying by the hour, leaving time for getting details refined perfectly).

- He'll nag and nag at you (either directly or by dropping polite hints) to keep trying until he's captured the absolutely best out of your instrument, regardless of whether you can do it or not (like what Matt said).
Sometimes even when you say it's good enough, he won't be satisfied and tell you to try again. Based on personal experience, there were times when I knew for a fact I couldn't execute the parts / ideas, but he keeps bugging me to try until I actually managed to do it in the end. I think that's the one thing you're gonna get from him; He's completely anal with his work, like what Matt says, and he's a great motivator to get the best outta ya (die die don't wanna settle for second best -_-). In the end, you'll actually end up progressing within your own musical standards.

- I didn't know he charges per project but personally that's a bonus for me if I were to record, cos I don't like to rush during creative projects. Shit happens when you rush, and you end up compromising on what it should sound like because of that ticking / kaching sound booming in your head and distracting you. Personally, I have no idea how anyone can work their music out under that kind of pressure..

- Mmz what else.. Unlimited amounts of breaks included, especially for chainsmokers. lol. Personally I notice that when we take breaks, he takes that time to listen through and brainstorm. Either that or when he's stressed he'll join you and pop a drink. Damn chill fella most of the time, given the shitload of work he has to do when you're done lol.

- My bassist (who has never recorded before at that time) got his sound fixed up and "enlightened" after a recording with Cedric. Well he was definitely happy with the output, from what I gathered from his first recording experience, especially when he had problems getting his sound right initially. Just one of the ways to second Matt's quote to Ced having a wide knowledge of things.

- Personally I think he's weird in the sense that he doesn't make your band sound like your band's got a set of songs in an album waiting to be recorded and shared to the world;
He makes your band sound like it's been around for some time and already got some recording label somewhere, lol. That's the impression I get anyway.

- Ced's a very patient guy to work with (esp when I keep screwing up my parts and swearing at the end lol).. he doesn't have this screwed-up, eye-rolling "god hurry up and get that part done right damn it i'm missing soccer" look, he has this "thinking" look. He doesn't wait for a musician to get their parts right; He keeps brainstorming on how he can improve it to the best of their abilities -whilst- you're recording, ears always on alert (tho he looks like he's daydreaming), and think of different recording methods or parts to suggest making it easier for you. I guess all I'm saying is that he doesn't judge you as a musician (I know some recording studios give that vibe and it gets pressurizing sometimes), but focuses on getting new ideas all the time to make you sound awesomepossum.

To sum it up, it's a very comfortable recording mindset and experience to work with on a creative level.


- I'd have to second Matt regarding his advice and ideas, which is the next thing I hugely admire him for. Sometimes I have no idea what he's thinking when he's suggesting little bits of this and that, but once the whole song is complete and mixed, everything fits in perfectly like a song you'd hear off the radio. He tends to surprise you like that.
I think one of the ways he works is that he has a strong sense of how things should sound overall before you start, so he works to fit the pieces in instead of working with only what instruments / musician capabilities / time he has or ideas you have (unless you die die wanna keep your ideas lah..). And that means calling for different ideas to happen instead of tossing them away to buy time.
So you'll end up getting a song polished up to the slightest detail, which doesn't seem to matter on its own at first but makes a tremendous difference in the overall sound. Yeah, that's his style lah. His head's like some dark secret abyssic music hall playing music that apparently only he hears until the song's complete.

- On recordings, sometimes when he thinks it's good but you're not convinced, he'll immediately take that as another chance to hear your best, no questions asked.

- He's a humbling character. Sometimes when we're not looking, he asks others for opinions and advice from people who have more experience in its calibre (be it by instrument or recording diff genres, etc) so that he doesn't miss anything out.

- Personally, I don't think he's motivated to work like crazy because he's being paid; His only concern is the output.


Just to be fair, I've tried reaping out some cons out of the experiences but it's hard to think of any because I feel there's more pros to them. Off my head, all I can recall is that I have to crawl under a blanket clipped over a hanger stand thingy to get to the mic (quite fun, like commando liddat) because it's recorded at his house's rooms, not a professional studio (one day perhaps!), and that his fridge sometimes runs out of non-gassy drinks (which I prefer.. :P) but nothing else so far. I'll update this section should I recall any negatives.
 
I think the 'live' feel is important but that's not the only reason you get into a studio. I'm a firm believer of studio magic n things that make a difference to a song that can be impossible live.

I'm sure cedrics great but I have never worked with him but this is what I think of Roland
Roland does something other than just record , be aided strongly in making a song a SONG . He was patient with ever longing need to have vocal harmony over vocal harmony n gave suggestions that I hadn't thought of . He becomes more than just a producer n more of a part of the band. I doubt Shades of Ember will get this LP done without him.. I think the studio gear in Big Ear are more than industry standard. I have a need of using my personal gear n that requires a different arrangement of thngs and roland is always more than willing to comply. A good producer not only wants to hear what he wants to hear but Roland has taken it a step even further and got to know my other members personally . Including preferences, influences and direction.
I think Ahmad bro, you have the wrong impression of how a song is recorded mixed and mastered . I AM a firm believer of never using vocal auto tuning but I know many bands who cannot live without. Roland works ok a bands strengths n with the diversity of these many bands, there can never be a correct way. Roland strength is adaptability and not just hardcore or metal. His work for For this Cycle , a mellow local act has proven his capability of being multi genre. I'll say Roland But that's my opinion. The guys got character and an added something to make bands sound good. He doesn't settle for 'not bad'
 
I am about to tell what is true and cool about Cedric, the dude that recorded AVA's debut album. Whatever i say about him, i'm not saying that Roland can't do the same or better, simply because I have not worked with Roland before. I hate comparing anyway!

So here goes. Cedric is committed, creative, funny, and most importantly, he's pretty anal during recording. He will make sure the band dish out their best takes. No compromise. Also, he is very knowledgeable as well. He knows his shit.


Word! Just recorded a song with cedric and hell yeah he's an easy going person. Had a great time recording with him, very Patient and flexible. And working with him has been easy for us. Funny guy i must say... Am actually Thinking of recording my band's album with him in the near future.. Nevertheless, all the best for ur pick bro...
 
there is nothing controversial here;

Roland and Cedric are both amazingly awesome at what they do, and not a single intelligent person here is going to deny that.

Naturally people will have their preferences, and you will have to make your own decision.

Now... Gibson or Fender?
 
One thing you guys got to understand is that every engineer will have a different mixing-style n approach from each other. I'm not really sure about their producing side for both of them, but I'm speaking about their engineering side.

If u hear both their work with various band, there is a slight distinct difference btween their works. Both their guitars are quite similar with Roland's bass to be a little more body and Cedric's bass to be more controlled. Roland's vocals are rather more "Intimate" kinda mix where as Cendric's vocals are more to the typical metals push-back kinda mix. These are the subtle parts. The main differences is their drums where Roland obvious is using samples and Cedric retaining the original acoustic drums sound.

At the end of the day it's all bout personal taste, what kinda mix do you prefer. And I do not think using samples are the right thing to do or something. Coz in fact alot of commercial band uses samples. But most of them layer both together. Samples are suppose to aid one so that we can get a more consistent sounding drums. Reason why we are using these tools to aid us is not becoz we are trying to cheat consumer or wat. Coz at the end of the day, album is the first thing that sells your band. Say for eg., a normal consumer who is purely for the music (but do not attend alot of those concerts n gigs) walks into a record store for music, so how do you let him know n gets attracted to your band's music is no doubt first, your compositions and arrangment, and secondly, the "Texture" of your music, which the texture is what the job of us engineers are about. For instance, if an RnB music has got this coarse metal texture, one might hav a little drawn back kinda effect to this piece of music (despite that the composition n not bad) as RnB tunes are suppose to b more smoothly than coarse, n hence, one will not expect to hear or would not feel too comfortable hearing a coarse texture on this kinda tune. It's like a a deer wearing or croc or cobra skin kinda thing. The deer is suppose to b an harmless animal, but wearing the croc/cobra skin makes u feel so uncomfortable with it. So both composition n texture have to work hand in hand to attract a consumer to buy your music, n hence, sell your band. So using samples are just a tool to create a more distinct texture.
 
Last edited:
the audience pays the band, the band pays the studio.

it's nice to see each of cedric's (Inversion Productions) and roland's (Big Ear Musica)recording bands showing their appreciation to the "usually forgotten/seldom mentioned" backstage roles of the sound the audience hears on the recording , in this thread.
 
the audience pays the band, the band pays the studio.

it's nice to see each of cedric's (Inversion Productions) and roland's (Big Ear Musica)recording bands showing their appreciation to the "usually forgotten/seldom mentioned" backstage roles of the sound the audience hears on the recording , in this thread.

Quality and observable effort doesn't go unrecognized. :)
 
Damn i dunno wad goes on in the list. I lazy to read the other 2 pages. if u settle alr or not....i jus going ahead with my view. When you gave me the two links, i would say that cedric has a better sound man. For me it really really be better to record at cedric. I heard of roland too many time. But if u r finding for some nice guy, come on u can go anywhere man....BUT now u r finding for music wise....If u listen to both the links.....you can hear that cedric is better man.Moreover , when someone said that hamartia recorded at cedric...that would even make me choose cedric coz when i first listen to hamartia one year ago i guess....i always thought they are some foreign bands coz u can roughly know how singapore song sounds like the crappy .....but when u listen to hamartia, it do sound foreign.......you get wat i mean:confused:
'
hahaha hope u get what i mean.....:D

PEACE NO WAR!!!!!
 
If you are just going to carry on reading to the forum bout who is better and stuff, you will end up dragging your ep. Go for your instinct. Everybody has their different views. Do your own research about it and see what's best for your band.
 
I'm Rudi and I play guitar for A Vacant Affair (not at the moment though, am studying abroad) and we had the privilege to record with Cedric over most part of 2008. It was an awesome experience working with him and I could say I've become a better musician going through the recording process with him

Do take note that when it comes to choosing a producer, it is best to do some homework and discuss among your bandmates the following to give you a better idea of what you want:

- Identifying CDs that everyone in your band likes as whole (How you would like the general mix of your EP/full length to sound like)
- Have each band member roughly list how they would like their individual instruments to sound (again, refer to your favourite CDs)
- Discuss how much money you guys are willing to spend <---- Very important!

I remember recommending Cedric to the guys and together we spent countless sessions discussing with him how our record should be put together. When everyone is trying to outdo one another by having their music cranked as loud as possible, Cedric really paid attention and applied the classic subtleties that made some of our band's favourite records really dynamic listens, as opposed to having our music squashed to the 11th degree.

We could discuss the feel of the album and general mixing style of the AVA record together and as a hands-on producer he was not only agreeable but most importantly realistic to what kind of sound we could achieve. He did not promise us the moon and the stars saying we could make a record on par with our favourite bands, but instead worked very closely together to craft something we could uniquely call our own and commonly agree on as pretty damn good.

Top of my head here are the things I remember when recording with him
- Mapping the tempo of songs to achieve a 'livelier' feel
- The countless number of retakes to get down even the subtlest parts
- Discussing openly if song arrangements work (i.e to 'give space' to vocal melodies so they fit in better as songs, when to hold back on arrangements)
- How to be a more considerate songwriter (i.e listening to others closely)
- Mapping out the overall feel of our album and deciding on what mixing techniques would work best for us through trial and error
- Getting a 101 on pinch harmonics!
- Tracking endless amounts of pick scrapes/guitar feedback to match the exact moods to a particular song
- The art of dialing in amp tones
- Going through heaps of guitars when it came to layering
- As much as he has an impressive array of gear, he is not afraid to experiment and mix and match sometimes even the most seemingly unimpressive gear to come up with some really killer sounds. Case in point check out the guitar solo portion on '108, We are losing you' of my band's album Reasons to Leave

I definitely see myself recording future material with him again :)

Hope that helps!
 
Back
Top