btherl
New member
Imo I think it makes better worth of our time sharing the "wrong teachings" of vocal teachers and their techniques and why they don't work for you, rather than promoting what works best for that individual.
Speaking of which, has anyone come across vocal teachers that do nothing but just play the piano and give you songs to sing after the the first two lessons or something?
Well, since you asked

While I did learn quite a bit from my first vocal teacher, there were some things he did which irritated me no end.
1. He spent 80% of the time demonstrating, and 20% of the time listening to me. Daniel is the opposite, spending most of his time listening to my voice.
2. When my voice was in bad shape, my old teacher would say that I hadn't worked on my fundamentals (breathing, relaxed throat, etc etc). Blame was always on me for not having done something. In contrast, Daniel fixes problems I have on the spot and then continues with the lesson. If he can't fix it then he has failed to teach me, it's not me who has failed.
3. My old teacher often talked about what I should be doing, but not how to achieve it. SLS is the opposite, consisting entirely of methods which achieve results. My old teacher would say "keep your vocal cords connected". Daniel says "Sing 'nay' this scale", and my vocal cords connect as a result of the sound I'm singing. It's the difference between saying what I should achieve, and giving me a method that actually achieves it.