Serj is right. post 9/11 i was arguing the same things that he wrote about. i've always been against this "war on terror", so to speak, because i think it was a move by Bush to satisfy US public demand for swift justice. i mean, i don't really think he had much of an alternative...it's hard to sit back when your people get killed, and carry out a really thorough investigation. mostly you just want to make sure it doesn't happen again so you set out to punish someone (maybe anyone) really publicly, as a demonstration of "you f*ck with me and i'll kill everyone in your damn country", ala Pax Romana.
but back to the war on terror, i don't believe it was done after a thorough investigation, and i'm quite sure this "pre-emptive strike" nonsense is against international laws on military engagement. and really the bottom line is that people don't usually do things without a reason. American trade embargos and foreign affairs approaches to Afghanistan have left tens of thousands of Afghans dying of starvation every year. shit, these people don't have much left to lose except their lives, and they certainly don't have much to gain from staying alive.
and it's not fair to them to have been trained and made use of by the CIA to act as a US proxy vs Russia in the cold war, and then to have been dumped after the fall of the USSR. these people have gotten nothing but the shit end of the stick from the States and they've been ignored the entire time.
honestly, if i were them, i'd be pretty pissed.
but still...just because they've been done great injustices doesn't mean they're doing the right thing in killing innocent people.