Behringer Sued by Roland !

joel68

Member
For Immediate Release
Lawrence Y. Iser, Esq.
Greenberg Glusker (310) 201-7411


BEHRINGER SUED FOR CLONING RENOWNED BOSS GUITAR EFFECTS PEDALS

(Los Angeles, February 24, 2005)- Leading electronic musical instrument and equipment manufacturer Roland Corporation ("Roland") has sued Behringer International GmbH and its subsidiaries ("Behringer") to enforce Roland's trade dress, trademark, and other intellectual property rights in and to the famous guitar effects pedals manufactured, distributed and sold by Roland's division, BOSS, as well as other Roland products.

BOSS has long been an industry leader in the design and manufacture of guitar effects pedals, recording equipment and other musical instrument accessories. In addition to their unparalleled sound, the BOSS pedals feature a unique combination of aesthetic design elements which have served to establish BOSS as an instantly-recognizable brand and to distinguish BOSS pedals from pedals manufactured by others.

The Complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleges that at the January, 2005 National Association of Music Merchants ("NAMM") industry trade show, Behringer announced the launch of a line of guitar effects pedals which replicate the distinctive design features of the BOSS pedals with such painstaking detail that the Behringer pedals are nearly indistinguishable from the BOSS pedals. Roland contends that this is no coincidence, and that the overall look and feel of the Behringer pedals is intentionally designed to confuse consumers as to the origin, sponsorship or affiliation of the Behringer Pedals, and to capitalize and profit from Roland's success, its impeccable reputation and the goodwill that it has developed over years of hard work.

The Complaint alleges that in an effort to gain industry acceptance of the cloned pedals, Behringer falsely assured industry retailers that the Behringer line of pedals was approved and endorsed by Roland.

Roland's subsidiary and exclusive United States distributor Roland Corporation U.S. has joined the suit as plaintiff. Plaintiffs are suing Behringer for trademark and trade dress infringement, unfair competition and a number of other causes of action aimed at protecting plaintiff's intellectual property rights.

Dennis Houlihan, President of Roland Corporation U.S. commented: "Imitation is not flattery, and is far from sincere, when the subject is Roland's valuable trade dress. Roland has expended monumental effort and substantial amounts to create and promote the design elements of its BOSS line of guitar effects pedals. Behringer's replication of the famous BOSS trade dress has caused extensive damage to Roland and its reputation, and Behringer's false claim that Roland has endorsed Behringer's unadulterated infringement is unconscionable."
 
Haha :lol: :lol: .....Behringer already changed the pedal color and design to less match BOSS effects....as shown in the cartoon illustration in their website.

Also got disclaimer at bottom. heehee.... makes me wonder whether they are in fact of chinese descend or not....heehee

Too bad man....wonder if they got start producing the clone-like ones already or not. Like that have to dump the lot.....heehee I don't mind to buy over the whole lot at dirt price, even if they deface it first.
 
Samson mixer

I remember years ago Mackie sued
Samson on their mixer infringement.
Now Beringher is getting it?

Will Yamaha sue Native Instruments for FM7 ?
I read Yamaha allowed that.
Alesis Fusion comes with Fm sythesis,
I believe Alesis is authorized.

You sue me, I sue you ?!
Money is all that matters ?
 
Gibson sue, fender sue, metallica sue, i love the days when we didnt have to worry so much and just play music as it is.
 
Re: Samson mixer

bongman said:
Will Yamaha sue Native Instruments for FM7 ?
I read Yamaha allowed that.
Alesis Fusion comes with Fm sythesis,
I believe Alesis is authorized.

Don't think Yamaha will sue. It that happens, something drastic will come of the sampling industry - Steinberg, Bosendorfer and Yamaha Grand pianos are sampled by many; many guitars are also sampled (from Fender to Ovation to who knows what); I've got Yamaha's DX11 samples (don't worry - all legal from sampling company - unless they get sued); drum kits are sampled and marketed as "Yamaha" and "Tama". Various softsynths other than NI (like Logic) call their electric pianos "DX" for obvious reasons. It will never end!

By the way, anybody heard of any responses from Behringer? Wonder what they've got to say.
 
anw, juz out of all curiousity, all dis suing here n dere abt trademarks, den how come line6 neva kena sue, they blantantly use fender and gibson and claim to model similar or better den the original guitars, how come they no sue?
 
man_kidal said:
Who cares if they're not legal anyway. Not like cops gonna ask you to not use them or something.

If the samples are not legal and used for a production, you can be sued big time. Has not happen in this context (ie "DX7 sounds used by other sampler developers and marketed as theirs"). But of course, samples (pirated ones) had been used by composers and music producers - little did they know that most samples are watermarked and nasty legal actions had been taken against them. Sample developers can be really unforgiving when it comes down to piracy because their market is already very small.
 
A recent law has been passed up called "Soundmark". It allows instrument makers to protect their sound. For example, Roland has successfully trademarked ("Soundmarked") their TR808 and TR909 analog sounds. So far, no legal precedent has happened yet to bring such a thing to court.

Sample developers argue that no 2 instruments of the same model (guitar or piano) sound exactly the same when played anyway. They also argue that there's more into the sampling than just placing a mic and press record (things like acoustic space, editing of samples etc).
 

Latest posts

Back
Top