Cheez
Moderator
I got my MOTU audio express interface and decided test and find out once and for all whether firewire 400 or USB 2.0 is faster.
Background: USB 2.0 has a faster transfer speed (480 Mbps) compared to Firewire 400 (400 Mbps). But firewire is said to be faster as it is peer-to-peer, allowing devices to control data transfer. USB 2, however, is master-slave, which means the computer controls the data transfer (technically taxing the system more).
One caveat - I'm running Kontakt streaming samples via an external USB drive. This may further tax the USB audio interfaces connected.
Both audio and midi signals are being processed, hence maxing out the transfer data as much as possible.
I tried both firewire and USB 2.0, and firewire is definitely faster. USB 2.0 encountered serious pops and clicks while none is encountered with firewire. So it's going to be firewire for me. Next is for somebody to test USB 3.0
Specs: 2.8GHz C2D, 6 GB RAM, external and internal HD 7200rpm, ASIO, buffer speed 256 (latency significant at 512), audio at 44.1KHz.
Background: USB 2.0 has a faster transfer speed (480 Mbps) compared to Firewire 400 (400 Mbps). But firewire is said to be faster as it is peer-to-peer, allowing devices to control data transfer. USB 2, however, is master-slave, which means the computer controls the data transfer (technically taxing the system more).
One caveat - I'm running Kontakt streaming samples via an external USB drive. This may further tax the USB audio interfaces connected.
Both audio and midi signals are being processed, hence maxing out the transfer data as much as possible.
I tried both firewire and USB 2.0, and firewire is definitely faster. USB 2.0 encountered serious pops and clicks while none is encountered with firewire. So it's going to be firewire for me. Next is for somebody to test USB 3.0
Specs: 2.8GHz C2D, 6 GB RAM, external and internal HD 7200rpm, ASIO, buffer speed 256 (latency significant at 512), audio at 44.1KHz.