Cheez
Moderator
I've always worked on my desktop for music. Got a notebook for a while but never got the time to really move my desktop setup onto the notebook - one reason is the fear that it will not work as well as I hoped (higher latencies, instability, slower performance etc).
Just want to share a success story - after I've finally tested my machine.
Specs:
Acer Aspire 1710, P4 2.8GHz
1.25GB RAM
External firewire drive (Seagate 120GB, 7200rpm)
Soundcard: Echo Indigo IO
MIDI: M-audio Midisport 1x1 (USB)
My plan is to have a portable setup to run mainly softsynths and softsamplers and also do audio recording. I plan to move everything to a portable setup eventually.
As some of you might know, I use Gigastudio 160 a lot. My desktop setup has 1x7200rpm IDE drive and 2 x 10,000rpm SCSI drives. Because Gigastudio streams samples from harddrives, the number of polyphony will depend on the drive speed (seek time). Moving to firewire drive at only 7200rpm is one concern for me. Also my firewire is 1394a (400) not 1394b (800) - there's the possible problem of transfer speed that will affect performance.
The other concern is the USB midi interface. My old interface is parallel - there are reports that say USB are slower than parallel.
I tested my system yesterday and much to my surprise, I am getting the full 160 notes polyphony from Gigastudio (when I play glissandoes up and down the keyboard multiple times, there are no clicks or pops at all) with no noticeable latencies. If I have GS3, I'm sure I can get 200-300 notes polyphony without any problems. My softsynths also give a near 0 latency (almost un-noticeable - probably about 3 milliseconds).
That changes some of my thinking:
1. external drive at 7200rpm is sufficient for most music applications (GS taxes hard drive more than audio recording) - no need for 10,000rpm drives
2. USB midi interfaces nowadays have very low latencies and the old school of thought (that parallel is better) is not true.
3. a portable setup can be as powerful as a desktop setup if configured and tweaked properly.
So, I'm moving entirely to a portable setup. And because I dual boot my notebook, I'm also using it for all my other applications like Microsoft Office in a separate boot partition.
I have not tested audio recording yet. For recording, I'm using an external USB 2.0 harddrive (Seagate 7200rpm). I have no time to test it - will have to wait a while before I get the time to perform more tests on recording.
Just want to share a success story - after I've finally tested my machine.
Specs:
Acer Aspire 1710, P4 2.8GHz
1.25GB RAM
External firewire drive (Seagate 120GB, 7200rpm)
Soundcard: Echo Indigo IO
MIDI: M-audio Midisport 1x1 (USB)
My plan is to have a portable setup to run mainly softsynths and softsamplers and also do audio recording. I plan to move everything to a portable setup eventually.
As some of you might know, I use Gigastudio 160 a lot. My desktop setup has 1x7200rpm IDE drive and 2 x 10,000rpm SCSI drives. Because Gigastudio streams samples from harddrives, the number of polyphony will depend on the drive speed (seek time). Moving to firewire drive at only 7200rpm is one concern for me. Also my firewire is 1394a (400) not 1394b (800) - there's the possible problem of transfer speed that will affect performance.
The other concern is the USB midi interface. My old interface is parallel - there are reports that say USB are slower than parallel.
I tested my system yesterday and much to my surprise, I am getting the full 160 notes polyphony from Gigastudio (when I play glissandoes up and down the keyboard multiple times, there are no clicks or pops at all) with no noticeable latencies. If I have GS3, I'm sure I can get 200-300 notes polyphony without any problems. My softsynths also give a near 0 latency (almost un-noticeable - probably about 3 milliseconds).
That changes some of my thinking:
1. external drive at 7200rpm is sufficient for most music applications (GS taxes hard drive more than audio recording) - no need for 10,000rpm drives
2. USB midi interfaces nowadays have very low latencies and the old school of thought (that parallel is better) is not true.
3. a portable setup can be as powerful as a desktop setup if configured and tweaked properly.
So, I'm moving entirely to a portable setup. And because I dual boot my notebook, I'm also using it for all my other applications like Microsoft Office in a separate boot partition.
I have not tested audio recording yet. For recording, I'm using an external USB 2.0 harddrive (Seagate 7200rpm). I have no time to test it - will have to wait a while before I get the time to perform more tests on recording.